llm_nerd

29 ms·

571.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
I'm super not interested in arguing with the peanut gallery (meaning people who don't know the platform but feel that they have absolute knowledge of it), but enough people have apps with CoreML models in them, running across a bi
572.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
An enormous number of people and products. I'm actually not sure if your comment is serious, because it seems to be of the "I don't, therefore no one does" variety.
573.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
MLX is a training/research framework, and the work product is usually a CoreML model. A CoreML model will use any and all resources that are available to it, at least if the resource fits for the need. The ANE is for very low power, ve
574.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
Indeed, their main grip seems to be with DV, and they seem to hold only EV certs as legitimate. They miss the entire value proposition and purpose of DVs. MITM is a user->service concern. If someone is between a service and LE, there are
575.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
>yes people are mostly chasing the latest trend https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2F-DItXtZs 15 years ago people were making the same "chasing trends" complaints. In that case there absolutely were people carg
576.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
>Empirically, that does not seem to be the case. Failures are astonishingly, vanishingly rare. Like it's amazing at this point how reliable almost every system is. There are a tiny number of failures at enormous scale operations (al
577.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
This piece is written with a pretty cliche dismissive tone that assumes that everything everyone else does is driven by cargo-culting if not outright ignorance. That people make these choices because they're just rushing to chase the
578.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
I'm being argumentative? Uproarious. Arguing that my observations are invalid because you were in a Victorinox shop in Switzerland is the chef's kiss on this ridiculous discussion. In the future, just move along. The other argum
579.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
It doesn't remotely repudiate anything I said, more than saying that Gpvos is the #1 seller of buggy whips ergo ipso facto buggy whips are super popular. This is not a hard logical chain to follow, so good god. But secondly, even that
580.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
>Victorinox is literally the #1 multitool brand by market share This doesn't repudiate anything I said, and it's a particularly weird canard. >That's why it's a popular one Increasingly the only ones I see leveragi
581.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
>Swiss Army knives seem to be as popular as ever. It isn't as popular as ever, at least not in the Western world. I don't know what your frame of reference is, but it is positively non-existent compared to a couple of decades a
582.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
This is totally an aside, but I wonder how long the "Swiss army knife" metaphor will hang on in popular culture. People generally use it to indicate that something does a variety of things, but I'd say many of younger generat
583.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
Almost everything with this administration is just lawless uncertainty so it's hard to tell, but has that actually happened yet? The last info I could find is that some sort of rough deal was solidifying, but that even things like the
584.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
Tiktok has long been extremely heavy handed with censorship. A slightly negative comment will get deleted and warnings meted out. Content that angers anyone gets flagged and often removed. And while there were some ephemeral movements whe
585.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
While it doesn't really change the meaning of the article, it's pretty clear that it isn't the calculator app leaking memory, per se. Tahoe seems to have some system/API memory leaks that while they might get attributed
586.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
Worldnews is only "conservative" in its zealously pro-Israel position. On a number of other topics it is very left-leaning in moderation. On immigration, for instance. As a classic conservative I actually believe in strong borders
587.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
>it is hardly relevant The entire basis of your argument was that it is for conservatives, so non-conservatives should be banned. And FWIW, I am classically a conservative. An actual conservative, not the cult of personality sort. In
588.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
To repeat, as you seemed to miss it, the conservative subreddit has little to nothing to do with conservatism the political philosophy. It is an echo chamber for MAGA, and people get banned for actually conservative views if they don&#x27
589.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
>If you post on /r/conservative you can expect to receive a bunch of bans from unrelated (popular) subs. Doesn't matter what you posted, being associated with that subs "taints" your account enough for some moder
590.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
Dear <<HN commentator>>, I didn't say it was made by an LLM, though, did I? I actually said it is written like a prompt for an LLM by someone trying to ape what they see as human behaviours. It comes across as spectacular
591.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
The whole post is super weird. It's like "A guide for an LLM agent to pretend empathy". Better advice -- do what's right for your and your relationship with the person. General advice is misdirected.
592.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
Liemandt was on the Peter Attia "The Drive" podcast a couple of days ago discussing this. The episode is 1 hr 37 minutes before you start applying multipliers.
593.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
Sure thing. I'm sorry I'm just not intelligent enough to have a discussion with an expert like yourself.
594.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
>These people with genetically low cholesterol, however, have other issues Neat. >You have to understand the point which you’re not yet able to put in your head Nowhere did I ever dismiss other causative inputs. All I did was reply
595.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
>He said LDL does not do anything on its own It's like saying a flying bullet can't do anything on its own. It is a meaningless statement. >As I pointed out in another post over 75% of people who have heart attacks have norm
596.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
>Lowering LDL doesn't actually do anything on its own Is this some sort of weird philosophical statement? Because, of course, it's completely nonsensical, and completely at odds with all data on this file. Lowering LDL reduces
597.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
You have left multiple comments for the sole purpose of muddying waters. So HN would probably be better off if you didn't reply. What did I "shout"? What are you even going off about? Don't project your angry fanaticism
598.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
>But lowering your LDL does not prevent heart disease Literally one of the most proven truths in medical science is that LDL levels has an almost directly relationship with CVD risk over the long term. Someone with low cholesterol can of
599.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
> If you have normal cholesterol though - we have long known that people with normal cholesterol also have heart attacks. Just to continue on this line, we also know that people with a genetic disposition for low cholesterol have a sign
600.
by llm_nerd 1y ago
Sure, but I'm not remotely blaming Biden[1]. A lot of tech companies took this on themselves, seeing themselves as arbiters of speech for a better world. Some admin ( Trump admin) people might have given them suggestions, but they did

More ›