llbbdd

15 ms·

271.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
Speaking as a saint, the accusation is certainly offensive.
272.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
And he's dead and he's been dead for a long time, and people still paying daily attention to this are being played for laughs and having their rage strip-mined.
273.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
And that's the direction the conversation always turns. You literally don't have any influence over that, neither do I. We have judges for that. The man died 7 years ago now, and the ongoing drip-feed of additional salacious infor
274.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
I'm sure that relativity is very comforting for people constantly drooling over this shit.
275.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
If you can think of any way to accelerate that, I'm down to help. I'm so tired of these perverts
276.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
I can think of some ways you could benefit the world without spending a cent
277.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
What a crazy subthread. You identified an obvious normal reason for him to have those things and then invented another reason, and then people agreed with you.
278.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
Called it
279.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
Upvoting for making me feel sane. I don't understand the level of attention paid to this shit, and it makes the people invested in it seem orders of magnitude more perverted than the financier himself is purported to be.
280.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
Are they building it for fun?
281.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
Same reason they do anything - we want it. The customers are the mirror.
282.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
I don't know why this would be surprising because anywhere purporting to be able to score like this is obviously lying to you
283.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
They caught up in performance but failed at what Apple was historically good at, vertical integration. Safari still sucks, and nobody talks about it because nobody uses it.
284.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
That's what bylines are for, though. Both authors are attributed, and are therefore both responsible. If they didn't both review the article before submitting that's their problem. It's exaggerating to call this throwing
285.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
Me too but I guess I should have been paying more attention to the screen
286.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
Lmao an investigation. They're riding it out over a long weekend, at which point it won't be at the top of this site, where all their critical traffic comes from, so they can keep planting turds at the top of Google News for every
287.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
The article "may have" drawn too much attention to how little they care.
288.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
It's not rushing to judgement, the judgement has been made. They published fraudulent quotes. Bubbling that liability up to Arse Technica is valuable for punishing them too but the journalist is ultimately responsible for what they pub
289.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
It's owned by Conde Nast. They know what they are.
290.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
Honestly frustrating that Scott chose not to name and shame the authors. Liability is the only thing that's going to stop this kind of ugly shit.
291.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
Google definitely benefited from being able to push Chrome on the homepage, but it was also a bit of a layup given every other browser completely sucked at the time. Chrome said that browsing the Internet didn't have to be slow and cau
292.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
Unless cold fusion allows everyone to literally pull infinite energy out of thin air with no maintenance or labor costs, I don't buy that premise. Many other utilities are effectively free already in some places, but you still need met
293.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
You're right, I'll leave the defense of the constitution to you. o7
294.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
If that's your excuse to respond with a useless charged non-sequitor, whatever works for you.
295.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
It's not plain sarcasm to purposefully misinform somebody asking a legitimate question. They asked for a definition, not your opinion. If you consider your parent comment "supporting the Constitution" maybe you should evaluat
296.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
My bad for assuming a good faith answer lol. I didn't realize we were just karma farming and virtue signaling, carry on
297.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
Supreme Court, not council. Are you sure you live here?
298.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
There may be a very fine line between reward-hacking for the user's benefit vs. building a facsimile of language learning on top of a nuclear-powered Gacha loop. I've looked at other learning apps (including I think Anki but I hav
299.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
I concede that repetition is a valuable part of learning and that there's no easy answer, but they way Duolingo does it seems pretty intentional given the level of polish they have in the app generally. When prior lessons reset, it can
300.
by llbbdd 8mo ago
Idk how to feel about this specifically but I kind of hope they come for Duolingo next. They are up to some similar mind hacking shit to keep people from leaving. There's the downright abusive streak management tactics that have become

More ›