Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lkjdsklf
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
151.
▲
by
lkjdsklf
4y ago
This is true in theory, but in practice it makes little difference. When California has increased demand, so do all the states it's connected to. Hence the rolling blackouts a couple years ago and more are expected for this summer.
152.
▲
by
lkjdsklf
4y ago
Hasn't happened yet this year, but they're expecting more capacity related rolling blackouts. This certainly isn't just a texas problem
153.
▲
by
lkjdsklf
4y ago
The very obvious one is remote work policies. Before you were only competing against people in your immediate area or people who were willing to move. Now you're competing against everyone. That's a much broader pool of employees
154.
▲
by
lkjdsklf
4y ago
> What a stretch to make them seem like on a whim law makers or tyrannical. It's not a stretch. They are literally "on a whim law makers." They decide what issues they want to take up and change the way they interpret the
155.
▲
by
lkjdsklf
4y ago
> mass protest by actually moving to blue states in massive numbers That actually makes the problem worse. You can't undo this without changing the court. You can't change the court without the senate and you can't get the
156.
▲
by
lkjdsklf
4y ago
An extension of my first point is that the supreme court decides what is constitutional and what isn't. My point was that only the supreme court can be allowed to overturn the supreme court. That's how it works. If the court decid
157.
▲
by
lkjdsklf
4y ago
The supreme court just said abortion is not constitutionally protected so SB-8 isn't bypassing constitutional rights. You might disagree with the court, but that doesn't matter since any law similar to SB-8 related to guns would b
158.
▲
by
lkjdsklf
4y ago
Firstly, the supreme court decides what the 2A means and they decided it does not mean that. The NYC law spit in the face of a previous supreme court decision. That can't be allowed. You can argue that the previous decision was wrong a
159.
▲
by
lkjdsklf
4y ago
The privacy argument is tenuous at best. We regulate how and what medical procedures can be performed all the time. > The same people who (falsely) screamed about vaccine mandates being a HIPAA violation sure don't give a fuck about
160.
▲
by
lkjdsklf
4y ago
Designing a laptop by sacrificing portability for camera quality is absolutely not rational design. No one is walking around taking photos with their macbook. It's only purpose is for the occasional video chat which, until recently, mo
161.
▲
by
lkjdsklf
4y ago
No. That's the first amendment. Free speech and the first amendment are not the same thing.
162.
▲
by
lkjdsklf
5y ago
You're kind of proving my point. The implication of this software isn't that Riot is going to steal your banking info. What would they possibly do with it? They're a legit business. They can't just starting selling bank
163.
▲
by
lkjdsklf
5y ago
Most people in the gaming communnity don't think about the implications of software like this. They just see it as more effective anti-cheat and don't consider the security and privacy concerns that come with something like this
164.
▲
by
lkjdsklf
6y ago
You would think that if the interview process was filtering on anxiety levels it would lead these companies to be full of people with high confidence which would mean imposter syndrome would not be a widespread issue.
165.
▲
by
lkjdsklf
7y ago
It's their actual product. Keeper. > Keeper is the first HCM tool to offer predictive attrition insights about an organization's employees based on publicly available data.