Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lkbm
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
91.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
The dumb jokes we've been flooded with June 2023 are some of the easiest content for AI to produce.
92.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
No one cares if the Pentagon refuses to do business with Anthropic. But Hegseth has declared that effective immediately, no one else working with the DoD can either--which includes the companies hosting Anthropics models (Amazon, Microsoft,
93.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
Anthropic already went through the process of getting approved to work in secure network. (I think xAI may have as well, but the others just don't have that access.)
94.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
I wish more ads offered me $1200 of usage followed by the option to either pay to keep using the product or just stop at no cost.
95.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
Github search gives me 11 300 results for 5000+ stars[0]. Dunno if they all qualify as open source, but that's also repos, not contributors. Presumably there's an average of > 1 per repo. NPM probably adds a lot. I can't f
96.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
What % of the time do you think that failure mode comes up?
97.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
My calendar is littered with the occasional "Cancel Wired subscription", "Cancel Amazon Unlimited", "Cancel Fitbit premium". This is a standard promotional offer, and it's trivial to not get bitten by it.
98.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
You also don't sue for malpractice unless something goes catastrophically wrong. I've had doctors make ludicrously bad diagnoses, and while it sucked until I found a competent doctor and got proper treatment, it wasn't someth
99.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
> Still regularly get wrong information from google’s search AI. The fact that the model most hyper-optimized for cheap+fast makes mistakes is not a particular compelling argument.
100.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
The Executive branch has de facto renamed it. Legally, the name is still Department of Defense, as that's set by Congress. Think of it as a marketing term, I guess.
101.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
It made a difference when the OpenAI board fired Altman. That was a incredibly high employee count, but losing even 10% of your employees would seriously hamper a company if it's the right employees. (This is also why the DoD move is s
102.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
Possibly, but it's just as much a predictive trait of being libertarian, which for all its faults, is extremely anti-authoritarian.
103.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
Claude isn't AGI, but this is a terrible argument. I'm better at Javascript than C, too. Does this mean I'm not a generalized intelligence? I'm just JS stack autocomplete?
104.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
Seems like the point of this website[0] is to provide a lot of concise, often opinionated design suggestions. Taken as a whole, it's interesting and worth browsing. This individual point? Under-developed. It also missed out on making a
105.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
This could use a lot more content. How do HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 change things? (Sonnet 4.6 and ChatGPT [idk default free] told me they don't. Gemini 3 Fast gave me a long essay on how they technically do.) Mostly it seems like it
106.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
Almost identical to mine, but you've got smarter awk use: `git prune origin && git branch -vv | grep 'origin/.*: gone]' | awk '{print $1}' | xargs git branch -D` I think I probably copied this from Stac
107.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
This is interesting to observe and quantify. I wish it weren't written in such a ChatGPT style. (I find the constant complaints about this sort of thing tiresome, but in some cases it's just so blatant that I complete sympathize.
108.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
It's amusing, but when it comes to doing actually work, I just don't care if my LLM fails things like this. I'm not trying to trick it, so falling for tricks is harmless for my use cases. Does it write quality, secure code?
109.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
They changed it from showing just number of files read to showing the actual paths/filenames. IE, it shows more information. EDIT: Ah, looks like verbose mode might show less than it used to, and you need to use a new mode (^o) to show
110.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
That's only showing me the first paragraph. Archive.is shows the full article: https://archive.is/nzo7W
111.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
It's old, but I suspect we still have pretty widespread agreement among experts: "If the federal budget is to be balanced, it should be done over the business cycle rather than yearly. (85% [of economics agree])"[0] A 3% rule
112.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
This looks like it's just the official Claude Code agent[0]. [0] https://github.com/anthropics/claude-plugins-official/blob/m...
113.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
Uh...there's constant talk from people being disturbed by it. One of the Democratic candidates in 2020 had his platform based around this, and I can assure you that it's not gotten less attention since ChatGPT came out.
114.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
Addendum: In the paragraph after merging Shockwave and GIFs, NYT references a Forbes interview[0] where she specifically says she didn't invent GIFs. NYT: > Ms. Gelobter was the director of program management at Macromedia where s
115.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
It's interesting to poke around and see how the game of telephone works. The first mentions I saw on Twitter were from February 2018[0]. Subsequent Black History Months[1] would reiterate how she invented GIFs or sometimes animated GIF
116.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
> The Wikipedia Tungsten article states the largest reserves are in China followed by Canada, Russia, Vietnam and Bolivia. This contradicts the articles claim. Just because it's all over does not mean it is easy to dig up and refine
117.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
Jevons Paradox applies to labor.
118.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
The blessing and the curse of the Internet. A few years ago, I was getting new bicycle tires and fellow overly analytic bicycle nerds had built a machine to measure the rolling resistance and puncture resistance of each tire[0], so I of cou
119.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
I don't know how these benchmarks work (do you do a hundred runs? A thousand runs?), but 0.1% seems like noise.
120.
▲
by
lkbm
8mo ago
I appreciate the support for the author, but the dismissal of critics as non-content producers misses that he's replying to Dan Abramov, primary author of the React documentation, and a pretty good intro Javascript course, among other
More ›