littlesnitch

6 ms·

31.
by littlesnitch 6mo ago
This is correct, of course. But I currently can't make the entire project Open Source. My other option would be to keep it completely private (wrote it mostly for myself in the first place). I think it's still better to make it pu
32.
by littlesnitch 6mo ago
If it connects to yoyo.org, you have subscribed to Peter Lowe's blocklist and Little Snitch is trying to update the list from there.
33.
by littlesnitch 6mo ago
Any proofs for this claim?
34.
by littlesnitch 6mo ago
You are referring to the TCP three way handshake problem here. The macOS version is bound by the API provided by Apple: We get the API call for filtering only after the three way handshake has started. The Linux version is limited in comp
35.
by littlesnitch 6mo ago
Disclaimer: I'm the developer of Little Snitch for Linux. Regarding MITM concerns: The eBPF component, which actually sees all the traffic, is Open Source (GPLv2). You can review it on Github and verify whether it sends any data to use
36.
by littlesnitch 6mo ago
Regarding unidentified processes: Little Snitch daemon must have been running when the process started in order to identify it reliably. It's best to reboot after installation so that Little Snitch starts before everything else. I shou
37.
by littlesnitch 6mo ago
Sorry, we have not tested on Fedora before release. Did not expect so much interest in the first hours after release... I have now installed Fedora in a VM (ARM64 architecture, though) and it does load, but cannot identify processes. I&#x27
38.
by littlesnitch 6mo ago
It depends. Little Snitch for Linux has a two level namespace for processes. It takes the process doing the connection and its parent process into account when evaluating rules. Also: If an interpreter is run via `#!/bin/interpret