Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
listless
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
40 ms
·
421.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
I think your first line nails it - there is no alternative, so we just keep on with the same terrible idea. The alternative _should_ be that we put you to work doing something you are interested in. I have 3 children and all of them were ca
422.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
More people need to watch “Naked and Afraid” to learn what the human body is capable of withstanding.
423.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
This is well said. The article is so weak and poorly laid out its like listening to a bad pop song through cheap speakers. It doesn’t even have a proper closing. Just ends abruptly.
424.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
It’s SO sad that this has to be political. I wish we could address arguments on their merits. That doesn’t seem like something that will be improving in the foreseeable future.
425.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
I felt like it went into overdrive in 2016. Maybe partially driven by a certain political figure who seemed to be the perfect foil. I think the irony of MAGA is that it made a bad situation far worse. Or rather, it was a self-fulfilling pro
426.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
Honestly disappointing that trolling is the top comment here. This is the kind of thing that we should hold each other above doing.
427.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
That first paragraph is straight up poetry
428.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
You can be outraged without donning a pair of horns and running through the capitol with a stolen lectern. This kind of overcharged rhetoric gets us nowhere when rhetoric is all we have to solve the problem.
429.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
I think there's plenty of reason to be concerned, but certainly not enough to be terrified or overreact with comments like "this comment is offensive".
430.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
So is NOW the time to short?
431.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
I agree with this and I would extend it to all politicians. Why are you communicating serious business via Twitter? Use formal outlets and put a little effort into it. Less than 22% of US adults have a Twitter account and less than 42% of t
432.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
This is a good idea. I’ll help too. Can someone post a link to something we could like that’s an objectively harmless right-wing meme?
433.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
USA here. Thank you for the well wishes. That means a lot to me.
434.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
There is a compatibility library https://deno.land/std@0.83.0/node . But they're at about 10 out of 35 for the Node Standard Lib. And There is no way to handle Node libs that use node-gyp - although I don't th
435.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
I assume the thinking goes something like this... "We know that x% of free accounts convert to premium. That means that if we can get more free accounts, we'll get more premium."
436.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
Here here. HN seems to be the last bastion of discourse.
437.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
I find myself in the exact same position. It's one thing if I say the election was stolen. I should not be censored for saying that it was. My voice alone will not sway anything. The problem is that so much power is concentrated with t
438.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
I think _that's_ the false equivalency right there. The right does the exact same thing, only it looks something like this... > "Why the false equivalency? Trump's stated goal is to bring back jobs and protect America. BLM
439.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
I'd be careful with us pretending one of these groups is less violent or more dangerous than the other. The right just got done making that same logical mistake. It's a long way to the bottom when you claim the high ground.
440.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
Good points - I mostly agree with 1 of them. 1) Storming the capital is far more concerning than some hippies setting up shop in Seattle. But I would contend that that these two extremes are pushing each other to more extremes and there is
441.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
That may very well happen. But the equal and opposite response here would be to setup your own infrastructure. We may very well see a "soft secession" as we have left providers and right providers and then we began to geographical
442.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
This is a good point and I agree with it. The market will sort this out better than we could with regulation. I do think that some may see this is a reason to go back to their own data center. It's also a reason why some content creato
443.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
If you’re a business, do you really want to be on a provider that can pull your card with little to no notice? That’s a lot of power. The boot is coming down hard right now. The cloud is looking like a risky bet.
444.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
It’s sarcasm. The poster is trying to point out that what’s being proposed is forced ideology. Re-education camps as it were.
445.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
> “BLM, the people who want their tax dollars to go to alternatives to policing” You’re coloring one ideology all good and another all bad. Not all MAGA people stormed the capital any more than all BLM supporters burned down a police pre
446.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
It seems like Parler gives law enforcement an easy way to track these folks and see what they’re planning. Is it really a good idea to send them underground? I’m also reading a lot about how you can’t incite violence. We should all be able
447.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
This is EXACTLY why this is bad. If you censor the narrative, then you get to control it and history tells us that the first thing you'll do with it is mislead the masses.
448.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
All the rally goers are not terrorists anymore than everyone who was at a BLM protest is Antifa. We’ve got to be very careful here not to paint all of MAGA with that brush because that ends in a dark, dark place.
449.
▲
Twitter Faces a Trumpless Future
(wsj.com)
1 points
by
listless
6y ago
|
0 comments
450.
▲
by
listless
6y ago
The censorship issue aside, it feels to me like these companies let this go on because it was good for their bottom line. Now that it looks like he's going away, they want distance. I'm not advocating for or against this action, j
More ›