Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lisper
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
121.
▲
by
lisper
7mo ago
> why hasn’t the boilerplate been automated as libraries or other abstractions? Cue the smug Lisp weenies.
122.
▲
by
lisper
7mo ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47185525
123.
▲
by
lisper
7mo ago
So the results are in, and I haven't actually noticed much of a change. Last night I went to sleep after 11 and woke up at 5:30. So apparently night shift by itself doesn't have much of an impact one way or the other, at least n
124.
▲
by
lisper
8mo ago
Parts of it once were, yes.
125.
▲
by
lisper
8mo ago
Night shift seems to have a very strong causal effect on my sleep cycles. Up until about ten years ago I was a night owl, rarely falling asleep before midnight and rarely waking up before 8. Then I started getting serious about light hygi
126.
▲
Asbestos is a bigger problem than we thought [video]
(youtube.com)
42 points
by
lisper
8mo ago
|
13 comments
127.
▲
by
lisper
8mo ago
> Plank units are not physical limits on reality itself We don't actually know that. They might be. Planck units are what happens when GR meets QM and we just don't know yet what happens there. But as a heuristic, they probab
128.
▲
by
lisper
8mo ago
Planck units are physical limits. The Planck mass is the limit of the mass of an elementary particle before it would form a black hole.
129.
▲
Martial arts robots at 2026 Spring Festival Gala [video]
(youtube.com)
136 points
by
lisper
8mo ago
|
141 comments
130.
▲
by
lisper
8mo ago
I have to confess I have not actually done the math.
131.
▲
by
lisper
8mo ago
:-)
132.
▲
by
lisper
8mo ago
Maybe. It's not clear whether these are fundamental limits or merely technological ones. Reversible (i.e. infinitely efficient) computing is theoretically possible.
133.
▲
by
lisper
8mo ago
This was my thought. Nanoseconds are an eternity. You want to be using Planck units for your worst-case analysis.
134.
▲
by
lisper
8mo ago
This analysis is not quite fair. It takes into account locality (i.e. the speed of light) when designing UUID schemes but not when computing the odds of a collision. Collisions only matter if the colliding UUIDs actually come into causal
135.
▲
Quantum observers can communicate across multiverse branches
(arxiv.org)
2 points
by
lisper
8mo ago
|
0 comments
136.
▲
by
lisper
8mo ago
I am in Honolulu right now and the power has gone out twice in the last three days because of high winds.
137.
▲
by
lisper
8mo ago
Yep. TFR was issued three hours ago. https://tfr.faa.gov/tfr3/?page=detail_6_2233
138.
▲
by
lisper
8mo ago
Um, where is the car? All the images are of (parts of) the interior, and the captioning is bizarre. Ooohh! It has a steering wheel! (And it's a input! Who knew?)
139.
▲
by
lisper
8mo ago
Singapore is on the equator, so winter is not even a well-defined concept there.
140.
▲
by
lisper
8mo ago
OK, so the defining characteristic of a monad M is that: a.M(b).M(c) = a.M(function(x){return b(x).M(c)}) So the next question is: why should I care about that pattern in particular?
141.
▲
by
lisper
8mo ago
> You need a Monad type in order to express that certain things are supposed to happen after other things This is the kind of explanation that drives me absolutely batshit crazy because it is fundamentally at odds with: > Do you under
142.
▲
Slate Auto – The Customizable EV That Works for You
(slate.auto)
2 points
by
lisper
8mo ago
|
0 comments
143.
▲
by
lisper
8mo ago
I can do you one better and specify that the normal base-2 integer represented by the bits is the number of up-arrows. But as /u/tromp has already pointed out, that is not very interesting.
144.
▲
by
lisper
8mo ago
Ah. Thanks.
145.
▲
by
lisper
8mo ago
Thanks!
146.
▲
by
lisper
8mo ago
How do you do that?
147.
▲
by
lisper
8mo ago
What do any of these comments have to do with this advertisement for the Apple1?
148.
▲
by
lisper
8mo ago
> Do you happen to know if there's any kinematic analyses of these suspensions available? Sorry, I have no idea. I never actually worked on the mechanics, just the software.
149.
▲
by
lisper
8mo ago
I had the privilege of working with Don back at JPL at the time he invented the rocker bogey. (I wrote the software for the first prototype with a computer on board.) Not only was he brilliant, he was also a really nice guy. I didn'
150.
▲
Frame Experiments [video]
(youtube.com)
1 points
by
lisper
8mo ago
|
0 comments
More ›