lisasays

27 ms·

361.
by lisasays 3y ago
So that 2 year-old was part of an advance attack-shaping strategy on the part of the Ukrainians? I gotcha.
362.
by lisasays 3y ago
A handful of Russian right wingers larping as Nazis is not equivalent to the threat of Nazi Germany. Look, it's objectively stupid and inflammatory , in any conflict, to not just send people over the border to do whatever business y
363.
by lisasays 3y ago
I mean sure, the situation isn't ideal, but so is being invaded by Russia. The thing is, this exactly the logic that moved so many people in so many European countries (including, very close to the front of the pack, Ukraine itself
364.
by lisasays 3y ago
And your point is? To the extent that there is any - it's that it's awfully negligent (on the part of Brussels), and stupid (of Kyiv) to be handing the enemy such a picture-perfect propaganda play. In fact, just about the shril
365.
by lisasays 3y ago
Not mentioned in the WP article is the fun fact that one of the major participating units (the Russia Volunteer Corps) is led by the Russo-German neo-Nazi Daniel Kapustin/Nikitin, aka White Rex: https://en.wikipedia.org&#x2F
366.
by lisasays 3y ago
https://archive.md/GAItH
367.
Use of NATO arms for attack in Russia raises doubts about Kyiv’s controls(washingtonpost.com)
8 points by lisasays 3y ago|29 comments
368.
by lisasays 3y ago
Discussion of original Washington Post article (which the AW piece basically canibalizes from): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36190485
369.
by lisasays 3y ago
https://archive.md/3HpIn
370.
Reactions to FDA approval of first Neuralink clinical trial(theguardian.com)
1 points by lisasays 3y ago|0 comments
371.
by lisasays 3y ago
https://archive.ph/uFUF3
372.
by lisasays 3y ago
When did anti-abortion become an adjective? It's standard English, perfectly acceptable and common.
373.
Amazon and Google fund anti-abortion lawmakers through complex shell game(theguardian.com)
15 points by lisasays 3y ago|11 comments
374.
by lisasays 3y ago
Sorry, but that's not how things work. When you buy property somewhere -- you agree to abide by the all of the existing codes and statues of that municipality / jurisdiction. Full stop. In the case of this guy -- he's no jus
375.
by lisasays 3y ago
This is never enough time to ask clarifying questions, diagram things, and get a good solution out unless it's similar to a problem I've already solved. Of course not - interviews aren't about assessing actual problem-solvi
376.
by lisasays 3y ago
If someone came up with a system design in 10 minutes, I wouldn’t want to hire them. Deep wisdom here, indeed. Don't you dare say this during an actual interview, though -- especially when you're asked to do the system design p
377.
by lisasays 3y ago
Better yet - have a bot write the paper for you, and post it to the arxiv. Then it will become accepted truth, without you having to do more than barely lift a finger.
378.
by lisasays 3y ago
I bet the developer snuck in there intentionally. And the "tips" go directly to, well, guess where.
379.
by lisasays 3y ago
It doesn't block it entirely of course - it just means that you get somewhat less of it. According to researchers, enough to mitigate the risk by a fair amount. Unfortunately we're going in circles here, and I'm going to hav
380.
by lisasays 3y ago
I'm talking about something specific it's the 'two sigma problem' That study refers to one-to-one tutoring by live, in-person teachers . Not your friggen' bots. I'm sorry, but there's way just too much
381.
by lisasays 3y ago
Personalized training is so much better, that you wouldn't have to spend so much time doing school or homework or whatever. Sorry - but fantastic claims need fantastic amounts of supporting evidence. It seems that all you have is a
382.
by lisasays 3y ago
That's very clearly not what the article is about. And even on it's own - that's a practically negligible benefit compared to the considerable risks and costs imposed by the coming epidemic of AI-fostered cheating.
383.
by lisasays 3y ago
Because not all the air goes through the sides. Some of it goes through, you know, the mask itself. Just because N95s are clearly better doesn't mean disposables are useless. Because, like, basic logic and stuff.
384.
by lisasays 3y ago
The title should reflect the fact that this thread is primary LeCun responding to Bengio, not the latter expressing himself. Unfortunately this "response" sounds more like a press release from his employer, whose actual track reco
385.
by lisasays 3y ago
Surely those drivers exist. They just don't seem to be the primary factor, for most folks.
386.
by lisasays 3y ago
A disposable mask with open sides cannot possibly filter particles that small out of the air you breathe. From basic physics -- of course it can. They don't work particularly well, but they do partly obstruct small droplet flow. In
387.
by lisasays 3y ago
Fun detail not mentioned in any of the news reports I've seen so far about the incursion: the confirmed Neo-nazi ties of the head of one of the fighting units, the Russian Volunteer Corps: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
388.
Pro-Ukrainian forces ‘still fighting in Russia’s Belgorod’ despite Moscow claims(theguardian.com)
2 points by lisasays 3y ago|2 comments
389.
by lisasays 3y ago
Not "absolutely nothing", according to research I've seen. Just not very much.
390.
by lisasays 3y ago
They sure do -- and they're your secret weapon. By providing a much more solid understanding than online-only approaches, minus the incremental negative health effects of working at your laptop. Let the cloud-native solution architects

More ›