liquidify

10 ms·

61.
by liquidify 6y ago
someone needs to take those watches that never need to be charged and turn them into an open source hardware platform.
62.
by liquidify 6y ago
I think they can easily be made secure. You just have to be willing to strongly type everything. It doesn't mean it would be conventional or easy, but it would eliminate most type safety issues that crop up during refactoring.
63.
by liquidify 6y ago
Why bother to write a book if you want to make it some kind of wishy washy political hack job that doesn't stand up against any scrutiny? What exactly is the point? Does anyone read it aside from reviewers such as the author? Who is
64.
by liquidify 6y ago
Guarantee people would screw it up by gaming the system.
65.
by liquidify 6y ago
That is just lovely.
66.
by liquidify 6y ago
They probably failed because they sucked in the digital realm. So it is a bit ironic.
67.
by liquidify 6y ago
I bet it really pisses them off that they can't stop trading in Dogecoin.
68.
by liquidify 6y ago
What exactly is going to come of this? Forcing the Saudi's to buy more weapons from us in order to keep us from 'doing' something to them?
69.
by liquidify 6y ago
Only issue with ffmpeg that I've ever had is that there are hundreds of legacy blogs and stack overflow solutions that show some old version of how to use whatever feature I currently need.
70.
by liquidify 6y ago
They have certainly been vague on those details. I assume it is because they are investigating, but maybe they are trying to protect an engineering failure or some otherwise embarrassing detail from leaking. "Forgot to plug it in&quo
71.
by liquidify 6y ago
"Specifically" makes it sounds like it only targets the M1. But as we have seen, it is found on both Intel and M1 products.
72.
by liquidify 6y ago
Pretty awesome article. Certainly as good as any other 'proof' I've seen.
73.
by liquidify 6y ago
Can we please get a mammoth already?
74.
by liquidify 6y ago
How much of that drop is because of the change in threshold of PCR testing, or do to the overall reduction in testing? Personally I think the testing has been poor since the beginning and we shouldn't trust the numbers we currently ha
75.
by liquidify 6y ago
Curious. Why C89?
76.
by liquidify 6y ago
How exactly can they do this without screwing up a bunch of other classes of use cases?
77.
by liquidify 6y ago
Stopping trading for certain groups while selectively giving privileged information and allowing trading for groups of friends is not the same thing as stopping trading for everyone. It is unethical at best, and more likely against the law
78.
by liquidify 6y ago
Robinhood gave privileged information regarding the details of securities to various capital groups, who directly benefitted. The 'exactness' of meeting the definition is a moot point. They certainly meet the spirit of the defin
79.
by liquidify 6y ago
Nicely written article. I also like your font and dark color scheme.
80.
by liquidify 6y ago
Wow this would be great.
81.
by liquidify 6y ago
Their actions meet the definition nearly exactly. The only difference is that Robinhood didn't directly execute the trades. However, the party making the trade doesn't matter. If insider information was used to benefit someone
82.
by liquidify 6y ago
This isn't a feeling of injustice. This is a direct action by a CEO and his company that by all standards meets the definition of insider trading. >>> The illegal practice of trading on the stock exchange to one's own ad
83.
by liquidify 6y ago
I used their ORM library in a medium sized project. As the project grew, it turned a nightmare scenario. After that experience, I stick to core and raw SQL queries. I hope 2.0 brings some meaningful changes.
84.
by liquidify 6y ago
Their actions were directly responsible for a huge number of people being financially ruined and another significant group financially benefitting (who happened to be their friends). They don't legally get to pick and choose market wi
85.
by liquidify 6y ago
Either way, the CEO personally deserves jail and financial ruin. Instead he will get money and power.
86.
by liquidify 6y ago
I think you underestimate demand massively. If bitcoin price ever starts to drop precipitously, it will be scooped up by a mass of buyers who have a ton of money to blow and a lot of interest in maintaining price. The only thing that coul
87.
by liquidify 6y ago
It doesn't work like this. If paypal's customers decide to cash out as a whole, then that means there is a net sell. There won't be enough buyers in paypal to cover the sells. They would need to expose themselves to anothe
88.
by liquidify 6y ago
They couldn't do that. If they didn't actually have any crypto, in the event of a large scale increase in price combined with a large scale cash out, Paypal would have to eat the difference from buy to sell price. They would los
89.
by liquidify 6y ago
Some blockchains don't support that use case. Others do.
90.
by liquidify 6y ago
If this is already out of date, what will prevent it from complete rot over time?

More ›