lionkor

8 ms·

151.
Show HN: AI Use Disclaimer(libls.org)
2 points by lionkor 4mo ago|0 comments
152.
by lionkor 4mo ago
That's fair, but that workflow is amateurish at best anyway. You're free to do that, if that's how you work, or if it all gets squashed in the end regardless, but a more sustainable workflow is to make committing itself an ex
153.
by lionkor 4mo ago
I think simply stating the extent of AI use openly is a good start. For example, this is what I've done on my hobby project[0]. I feel like an AI use disclosure page or document helps, especially when you didn't vibe-code but stil
154.
by lionkor 4mo ago
This is the source of that information: https://metr.org/blog/2025-07-10-early-2025-ai-experienced-o... The updated METR study on this gives different results, but they should still be quite sobering.
155.
by lionkor 4mo ago
Actually, all of them are fallible, very incompetent machines that are good at writing text. They're not people, they don't have any qualities of people except the really bad ones, and they are absolutely miserable at reasoning. T
156.
by lionkor 4mo ago
No, because (and you're never going to believe this) there is regulation, laws, and it's being enforced.
157.
by lionkor 4mo ago
Lol the AGENTS.md: > NO Co-Authored-By: Claude trailer. > NO " Generated with Claude Code" footer in PR bodies, commit messages, issue comments, or anywhere else. I actually have a much better idea how to use AI responsibly:
158.
by lionkor 4mo ago
Well it's not wrong, the solution isn't abstinence though, it's proper education, help for those who struggle with it, and making it legal and regulating it.
159.
by lionkor 4mo ago
This is how you do it when you're not AS childish. You go "here's a model for cybersecurity" and put a price on it. I know they're releasing it to some vendors first, etc. but the lack of a clown spectacle is nice.
160.
by lionkor 4mo ago
Your opinion on code quality doesn't match ours (people who agree)
161.
by lionkor 4mo ago
The language doesn't matter much if you have memory-hungry workloads. Whether it's Rust or C or C#, you can write quite memory efficient code in either.
162.
by lionkor 4mo ago
Here's your reminder that 20-30 days paid vacation plus unlimited sick days (3+ days needs a doctor's note) is normal in Europe (e.g. Germany). If you get sick during vacation, you get those vacation days "refunded" back
163.
by lionkor 4mo ago
This is not accurate. In Germany, you usually only have to get a doctor's note at 2 or 3 days, if youre only sick for a day or two you don't need one. And there's an unlimited number of sick days. As long as you have a doctor
164.
by lionkor 4mo ago
Here's the mail for that for anyone curious https://lore.kernel.org/all/99Mv9QEceyPrQhSP52MtAVmz0_kWJmzq...
165.
by lionkor 4mo ago
Rewriting ffmpeg in Rust will not solve it. The parts that are memory unsafe in ffmpeg, and similar projects, are not unsafe because C or C++ is inherently unsafe. Instead, it's the CODE that is unsafe. Translating the code (data struc
166.
by lionkor 4mo ago
It's a marketing stunt. If there's one thing we should have learned, it's that anthropic will do ANYTHING to get their product marketed as the biggest, most scary AI ever.
167.
by lionkor 4mo ago
This is so unbelievably incompetent from all sides, it's really impressive. So I guess the real moat is whether the US govt is happy to make your models sound more capable than they are?
168.
by lionkor 4mo ago
When prompted like this: > What could be the reason for a horizontal scrollbar appearing inside a <textarea>? Come up with a single likely fix path. Keep it terse. ChatGPT instantly responded with some speculation and then the same
169.
by lionkor 4mo ago
$1T valuation AI better be infallible.
170.
by lionkor 4mo ago
> straight up malicious Yes, against an AI agent. The super intelligent, "soon AGI" agent could have figured out that it's being messed with, but of course it didn't. I would blame the AI companies for marketing this,
171.
by lionkor 4mo ago
Absolutely. And I'm saying that the fix is to decide to write code. The AI isn't faster at producing good quality, well designed code that you'd write (if you're quite competent, which anyone can become with practice). T
172.
by lionkor 4mo ago
Nice! That explains it to a degree. I would suggest taking someone who is really annoying about details, from your team, and having them just use the components as they are. Just click around and mess with them for a while -- in my experien
173.
by lionkor 4mo ago
You can still write code by hand. Just do that, you will run into tasks that are too boring, those you can do with an LLM.
174.
by lionkor 4mo ago
You pay per token, even on subscription models the limit is tokens. If I was valued at 1 trillion dollars, and I was in the hole enough to sink a couple small countries' GDP, maybe I would slowly start to optimize to maximize token usa
175.
by lionkor 4mo ago
It is unmaintainable even if you spend 100k per month on tokens to have LLMs pretend they are maintaining it, if they slow down and make little ACTUAL progress. Sadly real progress is impossible to measure, if all you have is an overexcited
176.
by lionkor 4mo ago
It's usually better to create an issue where you explain this, then the PR is just the change. But this is up to each maintainer to decide, I guess.
177.
by lionkor 4mo ago
The performance is quite bad. There are some basics missing or broken. - no caching for file previews - no sorting by date in the file picker - no sorting by size in the file picker - no sorting by file type in the file picker - no search i
178.
by lionkor 4mo ago
Remove the human element. Yes, someone spent time fixing a bug. If the fix doesn't look like it makes sense on its own, do not merge it. If the author tries to convince you that it's a good fix, it's an immediate no. A good f
179.
by lionkor 4mo ago
Link to the anaconda PR: https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/7074#issuecomme...
180.
by lionkor 4mo ago
The difference is that bad untested excel spreadsheets didn't get trillion dollar valuation.

More ›