lionkor

30 ms·

871.
by lionkor 2y ago
that's a wild assumption that has no place here
872.
by lionkor 2y ago
Yeah, or you can spin up a few GPU clusters, upload your entire document, and ask it. Blender has built-in search. That's not what this is.
873.
by lionkor 2y ago
What I find curious is that, apparently, its okay to use AGPL and then modify it to say "but actually, no freedom for you"? Very strange.
874.
SpacetimeDB's License is modified AGPL(github.com)
3 points by lionkor 2y ago|2 comments
875.
by lionkor 2y ago
No, you do tutorials, and plenty of them. Takes a few days, and then you're pretty familiar. I don't think AI is needed here at all.
876.
by lionkor 2y ago
I have used blender plenty, I don't think it's mega intuitive, but it's not "I need something else to do the thinking for me" level hard.
877.
by lionkor 2y ago
It does say a lot about a person's attention span and intelligence when they cannot figure out one of the cleanest UIs in software, with such a buttload of tutorials and guides.
878.
by lionkor 2y ago
Again, what is the issue with funding? If I get funding from the German government, am I more trustworthy than someone who gets funding from the Hungarian government, like, really? Is there a real, tangible risk here that does not exist wit
879.
by lionkor 2y ago
Reputational loss isn't a good argument either, because what the comment I replied to said is that repositories in control of people in e.g. Russia are dangerous. That implies that a Russian or Chinese maintainer of popular open source
880.
by lionkor 2y ago
What about the fact that software is hosted on US/German/Australian/whatever else platforms and infrastructure, what's different with that, technically speaking? The fact that a majority of software we rely on is hosted
881.
by lionkor 2y ago
But you wouldn't call that car a general purpose vehicle
882.
by lionkor 2y ago
They don't. 1. LLMs are put in a position where everything they say is clearly based on encyclopedic knowledge of absolutely everything 2. LLMs try to use language that is very general, helpful and friendly, and as a result end up not
883.
by lionkor 2y ago
Here's an example: When asked about path buffer length in a programming context, ChatGPT 4-o claimed today tht 256 bytes is sufficient for *most systems*. That's an entirely false claim, like, completely invalid. It only says this
884.
by lionkor 2y ago
ChatGPT can just send you something that is completely wrong, and you have no way of knowing. That's why it's bad. On Wikipedia, for example, there is page history, page discussions, rules about sources, sources, and you can see w
885.
by lionkor 2y ago
No, bisect is not blame but for commits. Blame shows you which COMMIT is to blame. That's my point.
886.
by lionkor 2y ago
No, if your commits are meaningful and have plenty of context, like they should, then you are not looking for the author. Instead, you are looking for "why is this here", and the commit should tell you.
887.
by lionkor 2y ago
By the way, git blaming is really misunderstood by a lot of people; its NOT about who did it, its about which commit is to blame -- that's different.
888.
by lionkor 2y ago
Assuming that this would include properly closing sockets, etc. which the OS doesn't do the same way you might want to
889.
by lionkor 2y ago
> Managing memory in C is difficult and error prone. C++ solves this with smart pointers like std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr. No, it does not. Smart pointers are useful to help model lifetimes and ownership, but the real killer feat
890.
by lionkor 2y ago
Speak for yourself; the other tools aren't going away, just because you're less effective at using them
891.
by lionkor 2y ago
Distributed postgres
892.
by lionkor 2y ago
Well the way they did it (twice) means they had space for other stuff, and of course also failed because they didn't have enough redudancy
893.
by lionkor 2y ago
So three ones, two different models, one in a different location. These are like... basics, no?
894.
by lionkor 2y ago
the altimeter? Surely you would put three on there?
895.
by lionkor 2y ago
and of course generational poverty
896.
by lionkor 2y ago
People who only learn leetcode are designing everything, it seems
897.
by lionkor 2y ago
Not port, but you can just run them on wine and they run fine, most of the time.
898.
by lionkor 2y ago
Prominent figure says baseless thing to boost stock prices, more news at 6
899.
by lionkor 2y ago
not when you can let an ai play the notes for you
900.
by lionkor 2y ago
you guys = you Americans (I'm not American)

More ›