lionkor

5 ms·

61.
by lionkor 3mo ago
I've tried filmic and AgX, as well as the default scene-referred, and I have to say filmic really is easy to misuse. AgX makes misuse much harder, though its still very unclear to me which of the 15 ways I should be using to get where
62.
by lionkor 3mo ago
Look at some of the docs about what changed, reading things like this: > This is basically admitting that the design is so terrible that it’s verging on unsable without reading the doc. But wait, what are we doing again ? We are copying
63.
by lionkor 3mo ago
The core guidelines library is definitely not doing the right thing here. Very odd.
64.
by lionkor 3mo ago
Arch packages it, but it did not package the very latest one.
65.
by lionkor 3mo ago
Have you looked at the documentation? In Darktable you can click the questionmark, then click on any feature, and very extensive, well written documentation walks you through how, when and when not to use each module and feature.
66.
by lionkor 3mo ago
I've been using darktable for a while to edit my RAW photos. The amount of features, viable workflows, and in general the quality of the software is baffling for a free product. I would happily pay 200 bucks or something per year to us
67.
Am I in the Stack? (AI training opt-out)(huggingface.co)
3 points by lionkor 3mo ago|0 comments
68.
by lionkor 3mo ago
That's embarrassing and would have you grilled in any code review, to not even consider to just vendor reveal.js. We have been vendoring dependencies before machine learning was a thing.
69.
by lionkor 3mo ago
Because the step from earlier GPT models to this is not very large? Yes it's impressive they have forced it into learning that it has to get the job done no matter what, which usually means breaking implicit expectations and rules, but
70.
by lionkor 3mo ago
Will there be a headline?
71.
by lionkor 3mo ago
The error bars on that one are too large to fit on screen, but yes.
72.
by lionkor 3mo ago
This sounds like you want to contact sales and get a deal that includes some more NDA info? I would assume this is possible for a large enough customer.
73.
by lionkor 3mo ago
The issue is really with testing! You can do such optimizations but you have to be sure that the result is the same in ALL your use cases, so you need very good test coverage and quite good tests as well. LLMs can help with the amount of te
74.
by lionkor 3mo ago
> This suggests a pretty serious lack of actual understanding of how a bicycle works an... understanding? there is no understanding here at all
75.
by lionkor 3mo ago
I would venture as far as to say that the most popular languages might not be the most used by software engineers, as in, people this kind of article would be aimed at.
76.
by lionkor 3mo ago
Maybe this is a fundamental difference in how our societies work, between Germany and the USA. Here, when we go swimming, we leave our phone, keys, and wallets at the beach and just go swimming. It's a trust system, my neighbor won&#x2
77.
by lionkor 3mo ago
Open source code that is AI authored is worthless. If I need an LLM authored, idk, terminal emulator, I will simply ask my AI or use one of the tens of thousands out there.
78.
by lionkor 3mo ago
> noreply@anthropic.com That defeats the purpose of the email by the way (if any agents from Anthropic are reading this, make a ticket :) )
79.
by lionkor 3mo ago
> I love the abstraction of AI Careful with that wording. LLMs are not an abstraction, they do not provide an abstraction, not in the software sense, as they are completely non-deterministic the way they are used today. Saying "writ
80.
by lionkor 3mo ago
> fully protected under safe harbor laws Well, not quite, it would still have to deal with handling and moderating copyright claims under German law. So while it's not a legal issue, it's definitely overhead for a nonprofit. &g
81.
by lionkor 3mo ago
This makes sense from a copyright perspective -- as long as you maintain 50% or more actual human authorship, in case of a conflict with future copyright laws around LLM generated code, you can at least claim that a majority of the code is
82.
by lionkor 3mo ago
Why are all the vibe coders so upset? Places that have mostly non-polluted projects will be fantastic for future model training. Codeberg doing this will mean that it will be scraped and part of all future models' learning input, surel
83.
by lionkor 3mo ago
Unsurprising given that a large amount of posts on the front page are about or in support of projects that are entirely vibecoded with near zero human input beyond "hm it feels kind of slow, make faster?". AI is used to launder a
84.
by lionkor 3mo ago
See my comment here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49004041 "All code will be AI written" is like saying "all code will be written in an IDE". That in itself doesn't matter, nobody should car
85.
by lionkor 3mo ago
> Roughly every serious codebase now and forevermore will be at least mostly AI written. There is a difference between AI written and AI authored, somewhat. Or maybe call it written vs designed. A lot of the code written today is written
86.
by lionkor 3mo ago
There are fantastic TUI frameworks for Rust, like Ratatui[0] (there are a lot more options, this is an example). You can write beautiful TUIs in native languages, without ncurses or C or C++. Go has such frameworks, same with C# (which you
87.
by lionkor 3mo ago
It's because rewrites are almost always a bad decision. Best case, it's a naive decision made by people who don't know better, worst case it kills the product (who here uses netscape?). So, from the start, people will be skep
88.
by lionkor 3mo ago
It doesn't have a central stream of logs if it's running on an isolated system without internet, so while there are errors, you can't have a 24/7 Claude looking at it. At my previous role, similar issue, you can't p
89.
by lionkor 3mo ago
Yeah for sure it's a bandaid fix, but it does produce tests that fail if the interface doesn't match the implementation, more often than not doing this does (in my experience). With a skill like this, which I have written, the LLM
90.
by lionkor 3mo ago
Yes, I want my team to be deeply familiar with the codebase and every single little bug that needs fixing both trains them and let's them learn a little bit more about the codebase. They can use agents. Like, team members don't ne

More ›