lima

183 ms·

1. 1861.▲
   by lima 10y ago

   > It's the ROT13 of defense mechanisms. Not true. Modern port knocking is provably secure and requires network layer attacks to bypass.
2. 1862.▲
   by lima 10y ago

   More attack surface, not less.
3. 1863.▲
   by lima 10y ago

   It's great and can do differential syncing. It also doesn't blow up if you try to upload a few thousand files. OwnCloud is a joke in comparison.
4. 1864.▲
   by lima 10y ago

   Or just OpenHAB and the Eclipse Smart Home project. It's a well-established projects attempting to establish a standard for IoT interoperation - and it's working really, really well.
5. 1865.▲
   by lima 10y ago

   Or Docker containers :-)
6. 1866.▲
   by lima 10y ago

   Well, almost completely. The build dependencies don't change nearly as fast as the application, and are generally backwards compatible.
7. 1867.▲
   by lima 10y ago

   Nowadays, I no longer use the distribution Python at all. Debian Stable and pyenv it is. That way, I have a rock solid operating system and my application are completely decoupled. Using distribution packages for application deployments is
8. 1868.▲
   by lima 10y ago

   I used to, now I just do a right click -> Back. Zero effort with a trackpoint thankfully.
9. 1869.▲
   by lima 10y ago

   Now we only have to wait 5 years until they found all the obvious sandbox escape bugs.
10. 1870.▲
    by lima 10y ago

    There's no point in using fail2ban if you use public key authentication. It's a kludge which helps against brute force attacks, which are limited to password login. Since CoreOS enforces public key authentication, and the SSH serv
11. 1871.▲
    by lima 10y ago

    > If you want the right to shoot yourself in the foot, AV is the necessary evil you must have No. AVs are actually pretty useless at stopping anything except the most basic attacks (and sometimes, not even that - just look at Cryptolocke