Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lijok
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
47 ms
·
841.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Why?
842.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Judges son works at Microsoft
843.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Gamers rise up !
844.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Great question. Two things you're aiming for with a regulatory submission: 1) Get it approved. 2) Receive back as few rounds of questions as possible from the case officer, as each round delays approval. You can improve 2) by painting
845.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
> If your developer count is in the 10s, you are committing professional negligence chasing a microservices architecture. Such a strong statement. Might a lack of industry experience be driving such strong convictions of yours? Here are
846.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Imagine that board meeting
847.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
>> why drive kids in a car at all if this concerns them this much? Because they have to Genuinely confused what stance you're taking here
848.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
It's server racks with basically iLO on steroids. To be fair, simply being server a company that's easy to deal with is enough of a differentiator in this space. Would absolutely blindly buy from them just to avoid having to deal
849.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Exotic glues? Foreign molecules? I wonder. Are you aware that keeping your living space exquisitely clean compromises the development of a childs immune system?
850.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Well done and congratulations to the Oxide team ! Very excited to see where this company goes
851.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Your points do nothing to back up your claim that "serverless architectures are much more complicated compared to servers" 1. You still have to do polling with servers 2. Not a serverless problem 3. Not a serverless problem 4. Thi
852.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Because it's much cheaper to criticize than to rebut that criticism. And when the criticism is consistently along the lines of "vision pro [bad | expensive | weird | just like other bad thing]", people will naturally search f
853.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Fully agree
854.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
You've lost me pal. The discussion was about whether or not subs can be moderated without API access.
855.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
That is a great question, but not what is being discussed in this thread
856.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
I wonder whether Reddit C-suite are thinking exactly like this and that's what's causing these misguided decisions.
857.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
What argument in response to "Moderators absolutely can moderate without the API." are you making here?
858.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
> Moderators absolutely can moderate without the API. Practically, and literally impossible. There's CP and other illegal material being posted in these subs every second. Without API access, you have to have dozens of moderators at
859.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Did you miss the part where spez apologised for misunderstanding him?
860.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
> Engineers can much more easily maintain, learn and introspect infrastructure via Kubernetes Hahahaha
861.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
This is what's concerning. A team that just spent years creating revolutionary hardware that is leaps and bounds ahead of the competition, who by far have the most context to come up with a killer app, could not come up with one. The b
862.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
All day use when plugged in
863.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
The victim is the tech illiterate grandmother who got sold fake money by an expensive ad, financed by cryptobros who swear up and down they're invested because it's real currency, and not so they can make a profit by indirectly sc
864.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Disagree. I should be able to use my money to hire someone to kick you in the nuts.
865.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
You really haven't thought this through now have you. I think the old engineering adage applies: "Don't remove something until you understand exactly what it does and why it does it"
866.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Fixed an SPF issue by mucking around with SNAT rules. I think this is not the last time we'll see HEY's emails going to spam.