Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lijok
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
33 ms
·
721.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Could you explain how and why Hashicorp "get the maintenance burden"? Surely, if maintaining it was such a burden, Hashicorp could just stop maintaining it?
722.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
These are interesting. I've seen both before but never understood - if I have a config that cannot be easily written out in yml, why would I force my team to learn either one of these DSLs instead of using our main dev language (say py
723.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Could you point to the mentioned configuration languages with schemas, checks, imports, logic etc?
724.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Azure are about to have a boatload of DNS issues
725.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
I was going to comment here that semantic zoom would be amazing for C4 diagrams. Really excited about the work you're doing
726.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Can't wait until Corey Quinn finds a way run a container on this one
727.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
That has not been my experience with ChatGPT 4. If I were to ask it about some specialized info about quantum field theory or superconductor tech, I'm sure it would send back nonsense fairly frequently. But if I ask it to explain the d
728.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Highly efficient teams arrive at ~scrum naturally, without having to label it. You start with a highly efficient team, and scrum follows. Not the other way around. If you've got a team of individuals that do not naturally want to meet
729.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
> So far so good, perhaps. But, by creating this new abstraction, the programmer signals to posterity that this new abstraction is “the way things should be” and that this new abstraction ought not to be messed with. As a result, this ab
730.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Even when key change at runtime, wouldn't you use getattr on a module? for name in userfilters: filter_function = getattr(mymod, name, None) if filter_function is None: raise NotImplementedError(name) im = filte
731.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
I agree on your first statement, and raise a challenge on the second. We're smart, lets figure out how to create the same impact on general education. Could we wire up ChatGPT so it asks us questions and leads the conversation instead
732.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
You seem to be bothered by the idea that you may not be perfectly moral/ethical. You're a good person, therefore everything you do is by definition moral/ethical? It seems as if you're attaching the same connotations to
733.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Morality is a spectrum, not binary. Yes, all of the things you listed make me and you a less moral person, than say some random dude living in the woods with no access to a computer (all other things being equal).
734.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
> is the video game industry unethical for making billions of players expend exponentially higher compute (= emissions) for something as frivolous as slightly better graphics? Quite literally yes. See: https://en.wikipedia.org
735.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
I stopped writing tests a while ago. I define the protocol, ask ChatGPT to implement it using some tech, feed that back in and ask it to write tests for it. The implementation always needs massaging before, but the tests are almost always g
736.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Accelerate education at unprecedented levels (if we can figure out how to integrate LLMs into the education system). To this day I find myself doing a double take every time I'm about to ask ChatGPT to produce a ludicrous amount of out
737.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
> There needs to be a way to "sniff out" if there's topics that people are getting too close to danger zones for it to answer. Ways for organizations themselves to set those 'bounding boxes.' I wonder if this can
738.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
What I mean is, the situation of people misusing it should get better over time
739.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Should get better over time as the tool gets better incorporated into the industry. People always misuse new tools
740.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
If you’re not reviewing ChatGPT output before utilizing it, you’re doing it wrong and will end up in hot water
741.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Big time. Getting better very quickly however
742.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Is Hashicorp were to change Terraform protocols without extremely good justification, the project would be dead immediately. The existence of Terraform in its current state is bringing billions in revenue to vendors like AWS and GCP. There&
743.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
> like saying functions should be immutable then also saying the ideal function has 0 arguments, apparently mutating the class doesn’t actually make the function mutable to Bob Martin! What does "functions should be immutable"
744.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
That's very interesting. I found his code to be unreadable
745.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Does anyone know whether Obsidian can do this with some plugin, or whether there's another tool that can: I'm looking for a documentation tool with a decent GUI for editing documentation in, which is backed by git for tracking cha
746.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Your explanation made it click for me immediately. Thank you !
747.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
I overstated the timeline. The providers have minimum required Terraform versions, but I just checked the latest version of the AWS provider and it requires at least Terraform 0.13, which is over two years old now.
748.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
For Terraform specifically, not receiving updates is not an option. Within 6 months or so, you will stop receiving support for new, and some existing features of the big three cloud providers.
749.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
Had a scan through the list. Checkout.com, Argo Devops Solutions are the other two big boys. Interested if this actually picks up steam.
750.
▲
by
lijok
3y ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4vIBijzg4w
More ›