lijok

9 ms·

31.
by lijok 5mo ago
What about the projects that python handles better?
32.
by lijok 5mo ago
We should all go back to writing assembly
33.
by lijok 5mo ago
Or maybe you don’t understand what it means because you’re not the target audience?
34.
by lijok 5mo ago
Not really. This is all so new, noone is using it correctly, because noone knows how to yet. We’re all just kind of flailing our arms around with it, but it’s clearly a force multiplier and its increased use is an actionable signal
35.
by lijok 5mo ago
Noone knows what the correct structure for this new world looks like. We’ll see what they end up hiring for. But it’s fairly standard to lay off a bunch of people and hire new, rather than retrain, when you need to restructure
36.
by lijok 5mo ago
Which part of that sentence was confusing? I found it perfectly clear. Their internal AI use is exploding, which is a signal that they need to structure for that, and so they’re laying people off as one of the first steps towards actioning
37.
by lijok 5mo ago
Zirp ended over 4 years ago, what are you talking about, the us economy is collapsing? What? Care to elaborate on any of this?
38.
by lijok 5mo ago
Because it’s allegedly more expensive
39.
by lijok 5mo ago
It is not possible to make a piece of software completely secure because software sits atop hardware and hardware introduces its own security vulnerabilities that leak into software without possible recourse.
40.
by lijok 5mo ago
Why exactly would the H100s get retired for Blackwells if specifically power and DC permits were the bottleneck?
41.
by lijok 5mo ago
Not millions of dollars per sat. Are you being intentionally obtuse?
42.
by lijok 5mo ago
The current bottleneck is not silicon. There is plenty of silicon locked up in previous gen GPUs that are no longer efficient enough to run relative to newer models. The bottleneck is the economics of owning the older GPU models - which is
43.
by lijok 5mo ago
Millions of dollars? Where did you get that number from?
44.
by lijok 5mo ago
There are over 10k starlink sats in orbit already. They’re obtaining approval for another ~30k. So clearly not a problem for them.
45.
by lijok 5mo ago
Efficiency in the cooling loop is of no consequence as it has 0 opex cost in space. Do the capex numbers make sense?
46.
by lijok 5mo ago
And that’s sufficient for roughly 100 unoptimized DC grade H200s. Not efficient, and it doesn’t have to be, because the cooling system has 0 opex cost. And capex clearly can be made to wor
47.
by lijok 5mo ago
what do you mean they can’t get rid of heat? radiators exist
48.
by lijok 5mo ago
Why are you comparing the output of a datacenter to the output of a single sat? How much power do starlink sats draw and how does it compare to say 8x H200s?
49.
by lijok 5mo ago
Which is the same lifetime as a starlink sat
50.
by lijok 5mo ago
CF used to ban your account for shit like this just a year ago. That’s quite a shift in attitude
51.
by lijok 5mo ago
Links?
52.
by lijok 5mo ago
There’s one comment as of the time of your post that makes this assumption - you could have replied to them directly.
53.
by lijok 6mo ago
Yes, me
54.
by lijok 6mo ago
The final polishing for litography, yes
55.
by lijok 6mo ago
ASML are not the chokepoint for chips. Zeiss are. ASML can hire more engineers and build more machines. Zeiss cannot hire more mirror grinders. And noone wants to train as one.
56.
by lijok 6mo ago
Most transparent marketing stunt to date. 25k - come on now..
57.
by lijok 6mo ago
This isn't a web development concept. It's the unix philosophy of "write programs that do one thing and do it well" and interconnect them, being taken to the extremes that were never intended. We need a different hosting
58.
by lijok 6mo ago
ShinyHunters are a phishing group. What does this have to do with AI agents?
59.
by lijok 6mo ago
> who cares if it can store an exabyte if it takes all month to read it > You probably don't want to have to need a separate device to read and a device to write Are you only thinking about home consumer applications?
60.
by lijok 6mo ago
Not a very strong argument now is it?

More ›