lexcorvus

23 ms·

181.
by lexcorvus 13y ago
I appreciate your detailed response. As you might guess, I find many points of disagreement, but rather than belabor the matter with an enumeration of such points, let me just note that my comment wasn't a dissertation, so accusations
182.
by lexcorvus 13y ago
You raise a good point. Wikipedia's policy of NPOV (neutral point-of-view) effectively means "mainstream"; while I grant that "controversy" on this subject exists in the mainstream, I believe in this case the mainst
183.
by lexcorvus 13y ago
Women are not just under-represented in tech, but in the majority of the most lucrative professions as a whole. So, unless we accept the bogus argument that women are just naturally worse at stuff other than babies, we must assume that thi
184.
by lexcorvus 13y ago
Homo sapiens has evolved from a long line of primates exhibiting significant sexual dimorphism. [1] Attempts to eliminate spontaneously emerging gender roles are thus fighting millions of years of evolution. This doesn't necessarily
185.
by lexcorvus 13y ago
Monetary dilutionists (i.e., basically all legitimate economists, and thus almost all armchair economists well) and hard-money advocates (i.e., basically all legitimate thinkers pre-1920 or so) each accuse the other of practicing pseudoscie
186.
by lexcorvus 13y ago
Perkins' analogy was tone deaf but, as you note, not completely out to lunch. A much more apt analogy would have been to the French revolutionaries, particularly the Jacobins. Characterizing the anti-tech protests as neo-Nazi is a str