lewhoo

18 ms·

181.
by lewhoo 3y ago
Yeah but a two-page font size 20 alternative proposal would introduce a thousand obvious and another ten thousand non-obvious loopholes, much like that double negative of yours. (I'm not trying to be a grammar Nazi, English isn't
182.
by lewhoo 3y ago
The ones who are excited about these as tools are the ones who are openly inspired and want to inspire however the ones who claim copyright infringement seem to come off as insecure Yeah yeah, your side are the good guys and the other sid
183.
by lewhoo 3y ago
Models don't store any artist's works. They are way too small to do that. I have close to none knowledge on this subject but I find it very curious and I'd like to know more on that because it seems to me they don't st
184.
by lewhoo 3y ago
I'm a fan of the idea that people will start valuing, caring for, and protecting particular AI models I'm not a fan of the idea that the development of particular AI models will harm particular humans in the process but the over
185.
by lewhoo 3y ago
If the level of determinism is truly the same then I think that might play into the argument that AI output is indeed a statistical collage. And yes, human output might be as well but the burden of proof would be on the other side of the co
186.
by lewhoo 3y ago
I think in this case the product is the scene and not the picture though. If one could copyright the result of a prompt then I assume no one else could use the same (or very similar) prompt for profit as it is likely to produce similar code
187.
by lewhoo 3y ago
does it really matter? If it quacks like a duck, it's a duck I think it absolutely matters if by only quacking we also want to know is it possibly wanting, feeling, experiencing, having an ego etc. You say LLMs are able to reason, bu
188.
by lewhoo 3y ago
If "like a human" is enough to get human rights then why did I get a parking ticket even when I argued that my car just stands there like a human ? This really isn't as good a defense as people portray. There are a lot of rig
189.
by lewhoo 3y ago
"and so does every human who reads anything online" Why should things have human rights and privileges then ? I really don't know the solution to the emerging issues we face here, but I read the same "like a human"
190.
by lewhoo 3y ago
Yeah, a little bit. Our biology makes us unpredictable to a certain degree. In simple terms we're allowed to have a bad or a good day. LLM's remain unchangeable and simple mistakes they make can't be explained in the same man
191.
by lewhoo 3y ago
It is even more funny to equate objects with humans and give them the same rights and privileges. Can't wait for AI to gain parenthood leave after a copy.
192.
by lewhoo 3y ago
Oh I'm sorry. I didn't know it was AI that got us OUT of the dark ages in the first place.
193.
by lewhoo 3y ago
I'm not so sure about that. Public property is a category of property assigned typically to a defined community. For example, citizens of Russia don't have the rights to use at least some of the public property means of USA and s
194.
by lewhoo 3y ago
Except maybe public property which is arguably even more permissive ?
195.
by lewhoo 3y ago
"If I can make "Fair Use" of your book, why not your bed or your house?" I don't buy this. These kind of ridiculous parallels come from the assumption that it is ok to equate a book, a bed and a house for the purpos
196.
by lewhoo 4y ago
The latter. But I suppose it's typical. A given problem usually emerges for thousands of people so it's not surprising I was never the first to ask.
197.
by lewhoo 4y ago
It has also helped me hundreds of times.
198.
by lewhoo 4y ago
It's a feature. It's mimicking a politician.
199.
by lewhoo 4y ago
Papers will be written on how different reactions to AI emerged in all this noise. Unfortunately, I'm all in (unwillingly) for the doomers perspective. I really can't help it but I'd love to be proven wrong. Altman keeps sayi
200.
by lewhoo 4y ago
This is a shallow and overly optimistic answer. You really do think prompting will be required in the long term ? Unsupervised AI is (most likely) the future, and end goal.
201.
by lewhoo 4y ago
Yeah, you watch a tutorial, it's 3 months old - nothing works.
202.
by lewhoo 4y ago
Except during other times of turmoil people I think were generally able to predict what types of jobs are expected to flourish. The mining industry, metallurgy, transportation, constructing maintaining and operating machinery etc. With AI a
203.
by lewhoo 4y ago
I don't know. It's out of my scope that's why I'm asking. The infrastructure is there, the software is there and if not it soon most likely will be. What's left is to feed it domain specific data. To contribute some
204.
by lewhoo 4y ago
run AI-powered systems across all industries Sooo...data scientists ? Isn't the focal point of all of this the realization that given time (most likely a lot less than people thought before gpt's) AI systems won't need huma
205.
by lewhoo 4y ago
Thanks chat gpt. That's a very 2021 answer - definitely what we thought up till then. But the most curious thing is: both have led to job losses due to automation, but also created new jobs for skilled workers who were needed to opera
206.
by lewhoo 4y ago
Ok my bad. But still, why is it a good analogy again ? How does it compare to where we are. Walk me through it.
207.
by lewhoo 4y ago
And how good of an analogy is that ? On one hand there's something affecting a part of transportation (of course transportation directly or indirectly affects other things) and on the other something that will potentially affect every
208.
by lewhoo 4y ago
Firstly it's not even clear that AI will eliminate jobs without creating new ones. I would say that's pretty clear in the long run. AI will most likely create jobs, but how many jobs can it create ? Every white collar job potent
209.
by lewhoo 4y ago
Maybe I'm naive but I think it's a strong argument on why China won't catch up with the tech of LLM's and diffusion anytime soon. Half of their effort goes to censorship.
210.
by lewhoo 4y ago
I fundamentally disagree. Admitting danger dissuades people. Most want the thrill but not real danger. Placing the value in the danger aspect is like saying computer viruses are the most valuable thing in the world. I'm exaggerating a

More ›