Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lewhoo
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
by
lewhoo
2y ago
If our children use it to cheat in school then I suppose yes, those who do so are bad actors.
32.
▲
by
lewhoo
2y ago
Is this even a fair comparison ? Are we asking a LLM to count letters in an alphabet it never saw ?
33.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
You are focusing too much on formalities. It doesn't say so specifically, but a collateral of education, or maybe it's equally important as knowledge itself, is the ability of critical thinking.
34.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
My understanding is all of the issues on SWE-bench have at least a corresponding pull request.
35.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
Maybe that's the point of this research. Hey look, we reproduced the way to game the stats a bit. I really can't tell anymore.
36.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
> They are manipulating others by appealing to accessibility. I'd argue voice cloning isn't really crucial to accessibility. I mean, this is just cosmetics. I'd like to hear opinions of people who actually can benefit from
37.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
The level of scrutiny and plurality of opinions towards technology in general is imho what makes a tech forum good.
38.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
So many things contribute to human error it is probably impossible to make a 1 to 1 parallel with LLM's. For instance, the fact that you are being recorded is in many cases a significant performance drop.
39.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
But in this case why would you prefer approximation over answer ?
40.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
I'd argue our ancestors would outlive us had they had the medical care we do. I suspect our lifespan was prolonged mostly, or maybe solely due to advances in medicine.
41.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
There is reason to release new models if said models would be capable of grabbing a significant portion of job market currently occupied by humans.
42.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
Thank you. That's certainly interesting.
43.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
Definitely. I wish there was a stronger and more efficient way to call out scammers of global caliber. A system which bans Elon Musk from ever speaking about self-driving cars sounds somewhat oppressive, but I would be inclined to give it a
44.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
Is this indeed established ? Could you provide a link or three ?
45.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
> everything good in your life is because of applied intelligence If this is true then everything bad in my life is also due to applied intelligence as intelligence itself doesn't have a moral connotation. "[N]ow imagine 1000x
46.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
But can it draw a unicorn or not ?
47.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
> It’s already automated, you don’t need AI/ML to perform mass-phishing attempts. LDo you think there’s someone manually-dialing you every time you get a spam call? Ok, now you're being just stubborn. No, no one is manually dia
48.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
> It’s not absurd. It is, because I wasn't directly comparing AI to traffic but only reaching for an example to illustrate how irrelevant is the case whether the threat is something completely unique or not. > Handwringing over t
49.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
> But a car going into a stroller at 150mph versus 200mph is negligible. I guess when you distort every argument to an absurd you can claim you're right. > but with it would come a better awareness of their tactics I don't f
50.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
> Generative AI poses no unique threat; While the threat isn't unique the magnitude of the threat is. This is why you can't argue in court the threat of a car crash is nothing unique even when you're speeding vs driving wi
51.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
> but it's totally OK to not share the science... That passes for an explanation to you ? What exactly is the difference between openai and any company with a product then ? Hey, we made THIS and in order to make sure everyone can b
52.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
> Not known many people who enjoyed working in call centers. Because this is a type of a job that gets you by in your teens and twenties while you amass skills, degrees and knowledge. The fact that you don't enjoy it helps sometimes
53.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
https://huggingface.co/blog/synthetic-data-save-costs At doing whatever the model is suppose to do.
54.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
>In reality, LLMs are already trained on the output of other LLMs That's a fact, but are there any studies on training a LLM on it's own output and not the output of a different LLM ? For instance, chatgpt gets knowledge update
55.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
I think I'll restrain from buying into this until much more testing is conducted. There is information out there suggesting training on synthetic data is at least on par but cheaper.
56.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
I don't get it. The crux of it all seems to be that Google isn't competing with owners of data it crawls using the very same data. The crawl part isn't as much of a controversy as usage, isn't it ? The mentioned eBay v.
57.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
I agree. I simply claim that losing something you picked up in a week and losing something you dedicated your life to (in some cases, not all cases of course) is not exactly the same. It is also far easier in the former case to shrug off an
58.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
No, I specifically meant if your passion was to plow the field by hand . All I want is not to put an equals sign between something that takes years of formal education and years of self study and development, and something you can master i
59.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
> Sure don’t have kids. Your line ends here while others will potentially live among the star. That's a weird take. This isn't house Lannister vs house Stark you know. To keep the bloodline going really shouldn't be the fi
60.
▲
by
lewhoo
3y ago
If your passion was to plow the field by hand then I agree. Otherwise it is definitely not an equivalent.
More ›