leventov

8 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by leventov 12y ago

   I entirely agree with you. Naming the post "Comparison to Redis" and adding some paragraphs about this is a bit glory hunting, because having two buzzwords in the title is better than one :) Basically it's just Memcached inte
2. 62.▲
   by leventov 12y ago

   Now they think about adding concurrency anyway ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9026344 ) And one day they will implement that, because it is quite difficult to keep talking that single-threaded database solution is OK
3. 63.▲
   Memcached design and comparison with Redis(key-value-stories.blogspot.com)

   36 points by leventov 12y ago|9 comments
4. 64.▲
   by leventov 12y ago

   Comarison with Trove and other primitive collections libs: http://java.dzone.com/articles/time-memory-tradeoff-example Why faster: - no supplemental "states" array in open adressing implementation - keys and
5. 65.▲
   Show HN: OpenHFT Collections – the fastest Java hash sets and maps ever(github.com)

   4 points by leventov 12y ago|2 comments