leshow

48 ms·

481.
by leshow 7y ago
Are you diagnosed with a condition? If not, it sounds like your problem is psychological.
482.
by leshow 7y ago
I've been using an ergo infinity for a few years but this is the first time I've seen a "gergo". I just bought one! I like that it gets rid of all the keys I don't use on the ergo. Namely, the num layer and the far
483.
by leshow 7y ago
Shocker, another discontinued app from Google
484.
by leshow 7y ago
This type of blatant falsity is the reason I hate reddit. Everything is for it's appearances, nothing feels genuine.
485.
by leshow 7y ago
The fact is the OSS alternatives do have high quality type defs so there's no trade off to be had here. Like I said before, it's just my opinion, but I'd take a library with thousands of stars and a group of people maintainin
486.
by leshow 7y ago
Your library claims to be 'dual license' but your license file is empty. Just my personal opinion, but it's unlikely anyone will pay for this given the amount of free alternatives, and it's unlikely anyone will use it in
487.
by leshow 7y ago
Rust isn't really a fair comparison, not anymore anyway, it's very much a community led project.
488.
by leshow 7y ago
That's what I love about Rust, you get all of those things without having to sacrifice performance. i.e. I get a modern language, get to write code at a relatively high level, and still don't even have to use a GC. You learn to lo
489.
by leshow 7y ago
If my hypothesis is correct and it loses ground in benchmarks due to overhead of calling js dom methods, then I would expect native bindings to improve performance. I'm not an expert or anything in this field though, so maybe someone c
490.
by leshow 7y ago
That sounds like it's going to be a mess. If they introduce compile time checks that have the same strictness as Rust it will break existing code. It seems like Swift has already done that a few times over.
491.
by leshow 7y ago
It's great that there are a few projects that enable writing software for embedded devices in some languages you don't usually see in the space, but projects like this do not suddenly make the lang a 'systems language'.
492.
by leshow 7y ago
How is Elm/Om doing so well in those benchmarks? I would think that most wasm frameworks would be able to blow past any js framework fairly easily. edit: Ah, calls to js are still necessary to create DOM elements, so there's lots
493.
by leshow 7y ago
> Until then, if you are looking for a systems programming language, you owe it to yourself to investigate Nim[3], alongside Go, Crystal, Julia, D, Rust, Haskell, etc. Go, Crystal, Julia, Haskell and Nim all have a runtime that sort of p
494.
by leshow 7y ago
> But you don't need to understand the vagaries of undefined behavior, or the RVO, or move semantics to write and deploy perfectly sensible code. Don't you kind of have to though? These invariants are in your code no matter wha
495.
by leshow 7y ago
It was presented to show the "just use modern c++" counterargument to discussing the unsafety of c++ isn't a great argument. There are modern parts that are still unsafe.
496.
by leshow 7y ago
I think you'd be surprised, Rust has seen a lot of adoption & interest from the dynamic languages crowd.
497.
by leshow 7y ago
Rust has a great type system that enables the kinds of things you're talking about. It's like c++ and haskell came together and had a baby.
498.
by leshow 8y ago
Rust and Swift have different definitions of memory safety, don't they?
499.
by leshow 8y ago
Rust is immutable by default, optionally mut, and you lend different kinds of references & (immutable-- can have many) &mut (mutable reference-- must be unique)
500.
by leshow 8y ago
> It really should be noted that years later Joe changed his mind about OO and came to the realization that perhaps Erlang is the only object-oriented language :) But not in the way he's describing OO in his blog post. He's tal
501.
by leshow 8y ago
Except crystal's type system seems much more capable & powerful.
502.
by leshow 8y ago
I've taken this before for anxiety and while I do think it helps massively, it certainly isn't a single dose silver bullet. IMO you need to take it every time before the thing that causes you anxiety.
503.
by leshow 8y ago
A set could literally be: type HashSet<K> = HashMap<K, ()>; In which case it has all the properties of a hashmap except it doesn't use values. That's what we need for this problem.
504.
by leshow 8y ago
A set could have many implementations, it could be a HashSet and still have O(1) update/access. I was just referring to how using a hash map in this situation you actually don't need the value parameter-- so the correct data struc
505.
by leshow 8y ago
The sibling comment did a great job pointing these out. I agree with most of the points.
506.
by leshow 8y ago
I disagree, regardless of 'how you use' c# going from Java to Haskell will be a paradigm change whereas going to c# is an incremental change
507.
by leshow 8y ago
How can you compare another developers willingness to respond to SO surveys to your own?
508.
by leshow 8y ago
> In terms of the time issue, I spend about 15 minutes a day just before bedtime learning new languages. I probably manage to do this 4 days out of every 7. Do you find this actually works? Personally I've read entire books for a la
509.
by leshow 8y ago
I couldn't agree more, but if I could make a recommendation. If you already know a mainstream OO language, you won't get much benefit out of learning another in the same arena. Going from Java to C# you will learn less than going
510.
by leshow 8y ago
You don't even need the filter, all you need is: let dedup = strings.into_iter().map(|s| s.to_lowercase()).collect::<HashSet<_>>().into_iter().collect::<Vec<_>>();

More ›