Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lern_too_spel
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
91.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
You said "modernization of existing plants" but quoted "New coal-fired plants." China's 2025 five year plan targets peak coal before 2030 and might have already reached it in 2026. https://energyandclean
92.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
It was already recommended that healthy young men get the Pfizer vaccine instead of the Moderna vaccine. I'm not sure why you're bringing the non-mRNA AstraZeneca vaccine into this. Keep your conspiracy theories straight.
93.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
> And biological machine is? "Biological," too, is well defined. It relates to living things and their processes. > Why do the machine parts in biology show such flexible application? Evolution. > A gear cog won’t ever mo
94.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
The tech giants that are the source of the major conflict in the show didn't exist as powerful anti consumer entities in 1980 either. You can't have one without the other.
95.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
> If you claim LLMs produce thought, it's equivalent to claiming light bulbs undergo fission You're making a huge logical leap. There is nothing equivalent about these claims other than that they are made in English. > calli
96.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
> Why don't the details of how consciousness arises in one system inform your judgment of whether it can exist in a different system that only has partial structural overlap? A light bulb doesn't need to do fusion to make light
97.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
A "machine" is a term that is well defined in science. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine
98.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
The visible light produced by both an incandescent bulb and a star is a result of black body radiation, but otherwise, I don't understand your point. A light bulb produces light, something we might have relied on stars to do before. An
99.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
"Agent" is standard reinforcement learning terminology, used in Chris Watkins's thesis introducing Q-Learning in 1989.
100.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
They spent so many pages discussing it only to show that the mechanism for how ANNs work is different from the mechanism for how biological brains work. It says nothing about whether they can compute the same things.
101.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
Why aren't humans simply biological machines? There is no "science" that GP is brushing aside. You need to provide repeatable observations or experiments that GP is ignoring.
102.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
Whether human consciousness exists on neural nets or otherwise doesn't disallow an ANN in a particular configuration from being conscious. You might as well argue that human consciousness requires biological neurons, so artificial cons
103.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
If the cast were 44% Asian, there wouldn't be an issue. It's less than 10%.
104.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
What's more, they found that myocarditis risk was higher in the unvaccinated population after infection. This information didn't get to the so-called "skeptics," who willfully ignored data that didn't fit their cons
105.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
It should show the meaning of the colors and symbols of the flag after the user answers.
106.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
The judge unfortunately didn't ask Google to solve for F-Droid's use case, but app verification doesn't change it at all except for apps whose builds are reproducible, which F-Droid can serve the developer's signed build
107.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
App verification is what gets rid of the warnings. That is the entire purpose of its existence.
108.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
You don't have to look back very far. Tessier-Lavigne turned his forced resignation after being behind some of the largest research fraud in biotech history into one of the biggest raises (over $1 billion) in biotech history, pretty mu
109.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
It was one warning to install F-Droid (to allow installs from the app that downloaded it) and another warning to install your first app from F-Droid (to allow installs from F-Droid). The judge said those warnings were unacceptable. Hence, a
110.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
Meanwhile, Firefox derivatives are completely free with no ads and don't support the crypto grifts industry or removing rights from gay people.
111.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
But you see crypto ads in the browser's own settings.
112.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
See my original comment. To repeat, app verification makes it strictly easier to install apps as required by the judge's ruling . Asking your legislator to stop app verification will get you laughed at. My original comment also explai
113.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
They will continue to not verify their identity with Google, the same as they do now. This is where the new unknown sources installation flow comes in. In the future, their users on Google Android devices will have to enable developer mode
114.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
> Before the app verification, I could install apps from freedroid just fine without any scary warnings. All Google Android builds show a scary warning before you can install apps outside the system app stores. That's why the judg
115.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
> Why do you think it is your place to tell people where to prioritize their personal lobbying efforts? If you lobby for something that is obviously nonsensical, you are wasting your time. I am educating people in order to prevent them f
116.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
You're misremembering. Epic's entire developer account got banned by Apple. https://www.epicgames.com/site/news/apple-terminated-epic-s-... Google removed one of Epic's apps (not the entire develope
117.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
> the whole point of using an alternative app store is to be able to install apps that are NOT approved by google No, the whole point of using an alternative app store is to get better deals for developers or end users. Apps that are not
118.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
> Because imho that alone is a problem. That is already required to list an app on the Play Store. What app verification means is that if you've done that, you don't have to distribute through the play store. People can install
119.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
HN in general gets AB 1043 wrong as well, so that's kind of similar. There is no verification of age involved.
120.
▲
by
lern_too_spel
2mo ago
> No, because to install unverified apps the user has to 1) enable developer mode, As I said in my first comment, that change is separate from app verification. > which was already possible, so it is not enabled by app verification It
More ›