Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
leoh
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
42 ms
·
271.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
Unclear to me if satire or not; it seems entirely plausible that he and the team are exfiltrating data
272.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
Good employee, you get cookie and 1h extra pto
273.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
> Compiling takes forever until it fails with an obscure C11 error or missing C library features. And that makes for a fun, if often frustrating, challenge. Seems to me the trick to enhancing build times would be emulation using modern h
274.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
If only folks at Google’s Bayview Campus could learn to not piss all over the single occupancy bathroom’s toilet seats..
275.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
Even with today’s AI tech which may be able to pull this off, I’m not sure it would be cheaper with folks in the Philippines; nor is it clear that this could be a viable business?
276.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
>but only marginally worse My point is that I don't think OP is qualified to say whether or not USAID is putting a meaningful dent in the TB problem. It's entirely possible that, for example, if you deploy resources amongst ind
277.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
>I guess I'll stick to drinking water. But I'm sure there's a reason why that's bad for me. Micro-plastics, fluoride.. ;)
278.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
> Purge of USAID is likely to make the situation worse, but only marginally worse Do you have a degree in public health?
279.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
I have a 100% trade deficit with the grocery store and a 100% trade surplus with my employer. Expecting all parties to trade at parity is utterly insane.
280.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
Kind of surprising that the Oracle deal would have killed it given that Jobs and Ellison were such close friends.
281.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
Stallman’s insistence that a judge would side with him is pretty arrogant in my opinion; eg looking at Oracle v. Google decades later and how folks deciding the case seemed to be confused about technical matters.
282.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
This tracks with my experiences both at Google and [Google] X.
283.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
What is STOL, BRC, IMC?
284.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
Well they then stole from Ponoc, too, right?
285.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
I think it’s an interesting comment. Hard to not take that kind of thing personally though.
286.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
Personally I like to use -O8, it’s just even faster that way
287.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
Does anyone else find it sus that the VC firm is called Series X Capital? Sounds kinda Google X related.
288.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
Zurich, Munich, couple other cities often have higher salaries. Switzerland can also have low taxes which can boost your income, too, if living there interested you.
289.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
>LookML does seem to have invested a lot in compilation to different SQL backends, generally using the best syntax for each. To some degree, yes. Yet far and away, users of Looker use engines like RedShift, BigQuery, and Snowflake becaus
290.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
+1 for Calcite. Any more details on what you’re doing? Are you using a python library on top of calcite? Something else?
291.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
This is nonsense and the person who was advocating for implementation-aware transpilation is completely wrong. It is the role of a database engine implementation to service useful queries. Sometimes those queries are very complex; and yes,
292.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
Worth watching “Michael Clayton”
293.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
Not wanting 2 languages is ridiculous. Only one of them is actually safe. Whatever Linus thinks, empowering someone to say “no” to “two languages” is pretty idiotic; if someone did that to me, I wouldn’t go to social media to bitch about it
294.
▲
Homotopy Type Theory
(en.wikipedia.org)
3 points
by
leoh
2y ago
|
1 comments
295.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
What is RDS?
296.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
The Hebrew alphabet does not include vowels.
297.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
Incredible to see how much value Broadcom is destroying.
298.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
Amen
299.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
This is one of my favorite poems
300.
▲
by
leoh
2y ago
What they’re doing tends to be neither ambitious nor successful when you cut through the PR
More ›