Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
legobmw99
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
91.
▲
by
legobmw99
2y ago
I also wish I could make certain variables/flags part of the dependencies of a file, like if I have something with a lot of #defines that I really want to rebuild any time CPPFLAGS changes
92.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
I wouldn’t think they need to be if the releases are manually prepared and signed
93.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
How well do screen readers parse other compiler errors? This isn’t me trying to be snarky, I actually have no idea! Reading a C++ template error is hard enough as a sighted person
94.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
If you use the same syntax as OP, C’s parser will also round that literal. The existence of a hex literal for floats is something orthogonal
95.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
This seems completely unrelated to the grandparent comment’s mention of open source LLMs
96.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
Why would open source models make this scenario you are painting better?
97.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
Question from reading the abstract: how does one acquire this “second (trusted) compiler” when you are genuinely suspicious you are facing an adversary using an attack like this one?
98.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
I’m not quite following what the diff here is suggesting - was this some cmake magic to detect if a feature was enabled, but the file had an intentional syntax error?
99.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
One of my favorite short stories plays on the natural horror of this realization: https://www.teamten.com/lawrence/writings/coding-machines/
100.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
Surprisingly, it took until last year for someone to actually ask Ken for the code: https://research.swtch.com/nih
101.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
You really have to feel for the author. Stepping aside for personal reasons and having someone else take up the mantle of a project is supposed to be a success story of open source - I myself have been on both sides of that process before.
102.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
I believe they also do not include sub modules, which is a big disadvantage for some projects
103.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
Yes, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Tour_program
104.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
Perhaps the commenter means something like reverse mode automatic differentiation? Finite differences does indeed have stability issues, and even if you apply some tricks will only give you about half float precision
105.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
That honestly doesn’t seem that horrible - particularly compared to some of the nigh-on-impossible tasks like bootstrapping GHC (For the curious) https://elephly.net/posts/2017-01-09-bootstrapping-haskell-p...
106.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
TFA is about how they did make those exceptions in the final text
107.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
https://news.apache.org/foundation/entry/update-on-eu-softwa... This appears to be the article intended. At the very least it contains the quoted sentence
108.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
Wasn’t this anti-stall software exactly what caused those two fatal crashes a few years back?
109.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
If you subscribe to a service from your phone, it does show up there. My MLB subscription is also usable from my computer, but because I bought it on my phone it’s manageable there. Presumably if they decided to move that app to a 3rd party
110.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
Unity also wanted it to be retroactive to some extent IIRC
111.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
I think they do, but in a workflow where “make small commits” is now “make small merge requests”. When the merge request is squashed and merged, the message matters (which they say), but if you’re iterating on one small feature with feedbac
112.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
This gives a good overview of the pains in getting a package on to CRAN, but that is sadly only the beginning. If you end up getting users, the process described here becomes fractally bad for future updates, as you can also receive rejecti
113.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
Without end to end encryption, because that is not part of the standard, as the grandparent comment said
114.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
Java and C# seem to have actually gotten the idea of multiple implementations correct, in the sense that I have never needed to worry about the specific runtime being used as long as I get my language version correct. I have basically never
115.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
Related: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38047224
116.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
The author of left_right has a really great YouTube channel on Rust programming: https://youtube.com/@jonhoo
117.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
Reminds me of https://elephly.net/posts/2017-01-09-bootstrapping-haskell-p... The difficulty of bootstrapping GHC
118.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
Because C++ goes through the effort of letting you manually specify capture lists, I suspect they would never introduce a syntax which did not
119.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
Kind of like https://github.com/xoreaxeaxeax/movfuscator
120.
▲
by
legobmw99
3y ago
I used Coq in one class in school, and I never encountered wat or wreck. It’s possible they’re user- or library-defined tactics. One thing I think is important about Coq is that it really is meant to be interactive. Even after a fair amount
More ›