legacynl

9 ms·

91.
by legacynl 10mo ago
what the hell is a 'VRChat creator'? They make VR chats?
92.
by legacynl 10mo ago
That guy from smarter every day had a great youtube video about why that's basically impossible in the US right now: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZTGwcHQfLY I'm not a fan of big coorps either, but these change
93.
by legacynl 10mo ago
> I often ask myself whether that is ethical or not. But in the end, it’s not the tooling that’s unethical. Productivity increases are good for everyone, under normal circumstances. So if I'm reading your comment right, you think it
94.
by legacynl 10mo ago
Another post of his that isnt shadow banned!
95.
by legacynl 10mo ago
Is it tho? I think one of the supreme court judges sold out the US for a couple of holidays and a winnebago
96.
by legacynl 11mo ago
Basically yes. China doesn't have a democracy, and it's government isn't bound by it's laws. If CCP thinks deepseek or any other product/tech can be a beneficial to Chinese strategy they will come knocking, and ther
97.
by legacynl 1y ago
I don't get what point this article is trying to make. First the author is 'frustrated' that the kid doesn't like to watch TV (why?), and she dislikes that he doesn't talk about the episode. But in the end she prais
98.
by legacynl 1y ago
Same dude!
99.
by legacynl 1y ago
> Working on a original algorithm to explain human behavior from 3rd person perspective (1st stage). What does that mean?
100.
by legacynl 1y ago
Alright "touche" my guy, so original as well. > if you dont understand, let alone have mastered, git, then you dont get to have an opinion Eh Yeah kind of? If you use the wooden end of a hammer to try to hammer a nail, you don&
101.
by legacynl 1y ago
Who cares what their legislation says. Xi and ccp can change that at will at anytime.
102.
by legacynl 1y ago
> but what about the things that you would have never even tried without it The problem with that is that there's a lot of cases where a total newbie engaging with some subject could lead to problems. They have a false confidence in
103.
by legacynl 1y ago
> The author may have hit on the answer without realizing it. He's in the gym doing pull-ups. Is his lat strength necessary for some important part of his survival? Highly unlikely. Pre-20th century, when most work was highly physic
104.
by legacynl 1y ago
> No it doesn't require that because the vast majority of people aren't rational actors and they don't optimize for the quality of their work - they optimize for their own comfort and emotional experience. People are ratio
105.
by legacynl 1y ago
> Our survival, not hypotetical, but actual, on an individual basis is tied directly to how much value we personally can extract from others. Is it though? I think that's way too simplistic to even come close to being true. Is it ev
106.
by legacynl 1y ago
Although you're not learning any 'facts' or 'methods' you are training your 'sense of direction'. It's harder to put into words what this actually entails, but it is certainly a skill that you're
107.
by legacynl 1y ago
It reminds me of this issue at the MESA repo: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/work_items/13736 The OP of that issue actually tries to argue that he should be allowed to post code-suggestions t
108.
by legacynl 1y ago
Looking at the 'hands' of this robot, it looks to be exactly that.
109.
by legacynl 1y ago
Don't forget putin is actively pushing these parties in the US and Europe. It's not an organic backsliding of societies into fascism, but a concentrated effort
110.
by legacynl 1y ago
let's not make grand conclusions from singular observations, especially if they align with your own opinions. That's a recipe for deluding yourself. Human decency still exists as it has always done. But perhaps not in a form that
111.
by legacynl 1y ago
I have a television hooked up to my PC that I use for watching series/movies sometimes. I notice that playing the sound through the television's speakers makes the dialogue much more clear, than using my regular speakers. I think
112.
by legacynl 1y ago
Yeah okay I get it. The law basically states that 'not true' should be 'false' and vice versa. I still don't get what's the use of this, or is this just a curiosity? It seems like the result is just a kind of t
113.
by legacynl 1y ago
Ah alright, since I don't know what that is I will attribute it to my own lack of knowledge then.
114.
by legacynl 1y ago
We could just use 2 integers for floats and not deal with inaccuracies. Even easier.
115.
by legacynl 1y ago
I don't really get it.. In one of the last example's he writes: ` if (node.last_child(s) is Ok(last_child))` Is the part between the () not ultimately the same as a boolean expression? Like he wrote his own implementation of if&#x
116.
by legacynl 1y ago
I'm not advocating against social norms. But just those that don't make sense and only exist because they already exist. My personal design for 'the society we ultimately want' would be social norms based in proper value
117.
by legacynl 1y ago
I think you're misinterpreting my post. I'm not advocating against social norms, but rather specifically about 'etiquette' like how people aren't supposed to wear hats indoors, or that you should end all your senten
118.
by legacynl 1y ago
> Its a tale old as time older generations acting like the younger arent interested in work "in the right way", and one I do not want to perpetuate You can generalize that statement to include other things besides work. E.g. th
119.
by legacynl 1y ago
I hate when people complain about rudeness or etiquette. What is etiquette but an undemocratic set of rules that we are supposed to adhere to? We already have a set of rules that we all agree on, and it's called the law. Seriously, can
120.
by legacynl 1y ago
> The choice is generally "Either Apple or whatever else in my budget" Lol dude, stop acting like you know what's happening in my part of the world. People only care about apple because all major news outlets are payed by

More ›