left-struck

4 ms·

31.
by left-struck 26d ago
I think there’s still value in hand made furniture with little to no power tool involvement. There’s certainly value in creating furniture yourself in this way. It doesn’t give answer the question about the people who loved that job , the
32.
by left-struck 26d ago
Read the article, it will tell you why it won’t work.
33.
by left-struck 27d ago
Or ya know, make a gun using a cnc machine, or are they gonna ban those too? It’s so ridiculously easy to assemble a 3d printer from individually sourced parts, and find some open source firmware to run it. How is this going to stop anyone
34.
by left-struck 27d ago
There are some reasons like the added bom cost to the car. I guess it’s a nice option to have in the market but if what you’re going for is minimal carbon emissions impact it would be best to put those solar panels on house roof I think.
35.
by left-struck 28d ago
I disagree, clearly purchasing choices only hurt you and doesn’t help the situation. Instead we should embrace hacker culture and take by force that which won’t be given to us. By force I mean the gentle kind of force of forcibly owning the
36.
by left-struck 28d ago
I don’t think that will help with the TV installing malware on your pc. Though to your point, Claude or codex could probably help with that too.
37.
by left-struck 29d ago
Ah that’s great news, I’m from Perth but currently living abroad.
38.
by left-struck 29d ago
Something that is amazing about Sydney’s system though is that as a visitor to Sydney you can likely use the train system without needing an app or any sign up. Just use your credit or debit card via nfc on your phone (or the physical one)
39.
by left-struck 1mo ago
I actually don’t think banning “the algorithm” is the right solution either, nor are the identity verification disguised as age gates. But I would like to see the US government do something . I actually think Lina Khan was doing some good
40.
by left-struck 1mo ago
It’s interesting that you bring up wrongthink. Banning free speech would be something like out of 1984, but what we have is far more subtle and insidious. A system that shows you only what it wants you to see, while tricking you into thinki
41.
by left-struck 1mo ago
How would that be manipulative?
42.
by left-struck 1mo ago
I would fund things which make people less susceptible to manipulation and more equipped to think for themselves. Because I believe in democracy not as a political tool but as a fundamental right. I don’t wish to use democracy to gain more
43.
by left-struck 1mo ago
> And then we'll brand anyone who dares to go to the bathroom a sex offender >anyone What? I’ve never heard of this, what part of the world do you live in?
44.
by left-struck 1mo ago
No, you’d need to have the centre of the car exceed well beyond 9.8m/s^2 for a few milliseconds for airbags. I don’t know the exact figures but basically you’d need to smash another car into the car, at which point it would be easier t
45.
by left-struck 1mo ago
To detect impacts cars typically use sensors that require the entire car to experience significant acceleration, tapping the car definitely won’t do it.
46.
by left-struck 1mo ago
I think the premise of the article is more that it would be extraordinarily difficult to become a good writer if you didn’t read much. Because from the article: > One of the key things I’ve learned is this: there’s no real blueprint. So
47.
by left-struck 1mo ago
I also think that we should have mercy for people who’ve made mistakes. People who’ve willingly done dumb things, especially when they were young. I feel this way because I did dumb things when I was young, and I’m sure you did too dear rea
48.
by left-struck 1mo ago
Scanning is not the ip theft, it never was.
49.
by left-struck 1mo ago
Sorry, I didn’t realise you were the author
50.
by left-struck 1mo ago
Ah, sorry I wasn’t aware of that either
51.
by left-struck 1mo ago
You should make that obvious in some way like using “TLDR”. I assume many people, like me, would attempt to parse your comment as a comment on the article, after all it’s in the comment section, and read that way it’s very confusing lol.
52.
by left-struck 1mo ago
Why should corporations have the same rights and freedoms as human beings? I think this is a far more important question than do you believe in right or left economic policy. idc, I want you to know, do you think a human’s rights, especiall
53.
by left-struck 1mo ago
In my mind it’s similar to exif
54.
by left-struck 1mo ago
Most bicycle parts don’t cost thousands of dollars though
55.
by left-struck 1mo ago
While it may not be the majority of Linux usage, there’s a pretty big uptake in Linux desktop these days, and there millions of people actively using Linux desktop distros
56.
by left-struck 2mo ago
Have you tried call screening? I know for sure apple phones can do this but I believe some android phones can too? For me, all unknown calls are screened. Which means if someone who’s not in my contacts calls me, they get some automatic voi
57.
by left-struck 2mo ago
Having lived in both Australia and Japan and visited SK, for me it seems like it’s rude in all those places but only in some places do almost all the people care what strangers think enough to modify their behaviour. Which is not as judgmen
58.
by left-struck 2mo ago
740hz is the frame rate you’re capturing at?
59.
by left-struck 2mo ago
Listen, I hate shitty corporations too, but if you read the article it’s the government who shut down the business because of mold growth in the factory. Anyway, just saying there’s some nuance here. Like maybe if a government shuts down a
60.
by left-struck 2mo ago
Oh no, I just realised we’re going to have a nostalgia wave for old school AI in 20 to 30 years. Well maybe not you and I but it’s gonna happen.

More ›