learc83

67 ms·

631.
by learc83 6y ago
That's definitely the way to do it. For my first game I built pong.
632.
by learc83 6y ago
>It force content creators to write it in a certain way that in many cases might be way too long and not ’to the point’. This is a huge problem and google definitely makes it worse, but this has always been a problem. From magazine write
633.
by learc83 6y ago
But if you don't check frequently enough or read long enough then it is effectively filtering out tweets that aren't near the top.
634.
by learc83 6y ago
Maybe companies are using COVID as an excuse for layoffs, or it could be that advertising revenue is down for low end mobile games. But it doesn't really make sense for an industry that is seeing increased revenue to have a downturn. I
635.
by learc83 6y ago
>And there are people who want to live in the woods without interacting with people, with 0 use of $100. And people who don't like cookies at all, etc, Whether you're talking about utilitarianism or microeconomics, your utility
636.
by learc83 6y ago
VDOM isn't useless. It's basically an optimized immutability helper. React wouldn't have been feasible without it. But mutating the data directly is always going to be faster. If you want to operate at a level of abstraction
637.
by learc83 6y ago
>Those are prospective astronauts. I would expect them to be even more tolerant of CO2 and claustrophobia than submariners. They weren't prospective astronauts, they were "astronaut like individuals". Men and women in thei
638.
by learc83 6y ago
It's very unlikely that there's enough variability that some people can tolerate 10x the amount of C02 with zero effects. But if I'm wrong, you can look to the 3 other studies I linked that weren't submariners. The studi
639.
by learc83 6y ago
You don't need a VDOM to use a buffer to batch changes. A VDOM is a buffer that comes with a huge amount of overhead vs an ordinary sequential buffer of DOM manipulation commands. VDOM is an optimization that allowed react to be fast e
640.
by learc83 6y ago
The effects people are worried about are at 1k to 2k ppm. Even assuming CO2 is displacing O2 only, the drop in O2 levels is less than the change in about 100ft of elevation. Since oxygen only accounts for about 1/5 of the displaced gas
641.
by learc83 6y ago
I'm not unreceptive . It's entirely possible that fit militarily aged men under a certain height aren't as impacted by high C02 levels. However I find it unlikely that they are completely immune to the effect at a dose 10x hi
642.
by learc83 6y ago
The used the same kind of decision making skills test that the tests that showed cognitive decline due to CO2 used.
643.
by learc83 6y ago
Studies that raised the alarm on C02 levels showed a severe impact on cognitive function at 1,500ppm. Submariners routinely live and work in levels at 5,000ppm. >baseline level of cognitive performance that's already impacted by chr
644.
by learc83 6y ago
It's not a good random sample, but they were exposed to C02 levels 10x higher than what you'd be exposed to even in a poorly ventilated conference room.
645.
by learc83 6y ago
They were exposed to C02 levels 10x higher than what you'd be exposed to even in a poorly ventilated conference room. It's likely that this mitigates any biological differences. Nothing is certain, but that study combined with t
646.
by learc83 6y ago
The navy has extensively studied performance in high CO2 environments on submarines, and found that it has no impact under levels much higher than you're likely to get indoors. This study found no impact on decision making at 15000 ppm
647.
by learc83 6y ago
>Virtual DOM actually has some efficiency benefits. Please explain these efficiency benefits. VDOM architecture can't be faster than native javascript updating the DOM because at the end of the day you still have to to use native ja
648.
by learc83 6y ago
Not all of them. Without the overhead of rendering everything to a virtual DOM and then doing a diff, performance can get pretty close to native javascript--the sweet spot the author mentions gets bigger. Plus since the framework is mostly
649.
by learc83 6y ago
That's absurd. Why do you think that a particular smallpox or measles epidemic dies out? Because enough people have been infected in a given population that it can no longer spread in that population. That doesn't mean the disease
650.
by learc83 6y ago
A spark gap generator would probably work better for that, but jamming is illegal.
651.
by learc83 6y ago
Svelte is another component based js framework that specifically avoids using a VDOM.
652.
by learc83 6y ago
It's a felony. A felony that requires you to commit it in person at a precinct is a pretty high bar for an internet troll to get people to jump. Assuming some people decide to take them up on it, they have to coordinate or they'll
653.
by learc83 6y ago
>With such a tight margins we have a lot of valid attack vectors In person voter fraud--the kind stopped by requiring poll workers to check ID--isn't one of them. You would need thousands of coordinated attackers to change 80k votes
654.
by learc83 6y ago
>There is literally nothing stopping anyone from doing that. Other than the fact that it's a serious felony. Additionally how are voter ID laws going to change this? It already requires some level of cooperation by the kid in that t
655.
by learc83 6y ago
You're talking a coordinated conspiracy involving thousands of people. The FBI would have hard evidence during the recruiting phase. You can't involve that many people in something and keep it secret. Even in the best case were we
656.
by learc83 6y ago
If there are enough double votes that throwing them all out changes the election. Then yes, do-over. The possibility of that happening is basically non-existent though because it would require a coordinated attack by thousands of people to
657.
by learc83 6y ago
Even assuming 1 person could make it through 10-20 precincts per day, you're going to need thousands of attackers to change even a close national election. Coordination on that scale is completely impossible to pull off without detecti
658.
by learc83 6y ago
>Why is the standard of evidence for one different than the other? Because hacking one voting machine potentially allows one person or a small group of people to alter thousands of votes. That person (or persons) has no way to alter anyw
659.
by learc83 6y ago
That chart is from data collected between 1996 and 2003. It is very outdated.
660.
by learc83 6y ago
Where are you getting those numbers. From this study it looks like 20% of Swedish adults are obese. That's compared to 36.5% of US adults. Also the swedish study is from 2012, so it's probably slightly higher now. https:/&#x

More ›