leandrod

9 ms·

61.
by leandrod 15y ago
Sounds like the paþ to madneß…
62.
by leandrod 15y ago
Sounds like the http://mywiki.wooledge.org/XyProblem
63.
by leandrod 15y ago
You are confusing triggers with log shipping.
64.
by leandrod 15y ago
http://postgres-xc.sourceforge.net/ does not count?
65.
by leandrod 15y ago
Wasn’t ðis ðe guy who has recently advertised for ðe Free Software Foundation? Woman, ðy name is inconstancy…
66.
by leandrod 15y ago
No, PostgreSQL is way better. It has a mostly compliant SQL dialect. It is more compatible with other DBMSs, specially DB2 but also Oracle. It implements a host of procedural programming languages and extensions, including types and operato
67.
by leandrod 15y ago
Jules Verne’s _The Floating Island_ foresaw ðis. Its conclusion? Inhabitants could not agree on much, so the island got torn apart.
68.
by leandrod 15y ago
Seem to be ðe same idea behind Gnome.
69.
by leandrod 15y ago
I have been expecting it to do well for several years already. Not really, but I guess you make my point.
70.
by leandrod 16y ago
Way before that — the X window system.
71.
by leandrod 16y ago
Ðe irony… : Error establishing a database connection
72.
by leandrod 17y ago
Is not this the one who was just now commemorating free software?
73.
by leandrod 17y ago
Ðat may be true, but what platforms do internally ſhould not affect ðeir flavours of SQL. In oðer words, internal implementation as ſets do not make SQL ſet‐baſed.
74.
by leandrod 17y ago
Sorry, it is wrong. SQL is not baſed on ſets, but bags, which are quite different and more complicated. And, by the way, CTEs are a feature of ISO SQL, not only of MS SQL Server. Finally, entity‐relationſhip is not terribly practical as a