ldng

73 ms·

871.
by ldng 15y ago
I was hoping for more profound changes. I've never read PHP internals but I'm under the impression the opcode language is not 'jitable' because it's an unformal mess while even python and lua are getting there ... It seems that Opcode cachi
872.
by ldng 15y ago
Hum, fells like a deja vu. And they'll pervert some standard along the way, right ? Wouldn't be fun otherwise, would it ?
873.
by ldng 15y ago
And when they mess up with OpenJDK they'll give it to the PHP community ? What about MySQL, which bureaucratic and loosely related community shall it be given in case thinks goes south in your opinion ?
874.
by ldng 15y ago
Matthew Garrett opinion on the matter : http://www.advogato.org/person/mjg59/diary/296.html
875.
by ldng 15y ago
You're right about gdm, still I didn't noticed it until you told me. I think most people just change the wallpaper and at most apply a different control theme. Well I don't really get you point on the controls and screen estate then. To me
876.
by ldng 15y ago
Good for them, as long as they don't FUD on GNOME. Better usability ? I don't think so, I remember being orce fed the first version of message indactor with Gwibber, Pidgin and Evolution were 3 entries of the same menu behaving totally diff
877.
by ldng 15y ago
I don't care about them drifting away. I might even understand some point they made about GNOME. What I don't appreciate it's some people in Ubuntu world (that would be community and canonical) blaming GNOME Upstream for the drift. They wan
878.
by ldng 15y ago
Unity doesn't strikes me as particularly light ... I am not sure pissing off core GNOME developers with its ever changing new directions is going to help them in the long run. On the other hand I might be proved wrong if while increase its
879.
by ldng 15y ago
And still no source Luke. Not even for 3.0 ...
880.
by ldng 15y ago
This is an ugly desperate move and the Eclipse Foundation shouldn't take part in the fight and reject the project. But I pretty sure Oracle will bind money to the offer and the foundation will say yes. Oracle aim is control through bureaucr
881.
by ldng 16y ago
It's quite neat but really crashy.
882.
by ldng 16y ago
They're just piggybacking trend and making profit of it, that how there used. Maybe not why and how they were designed. Still, IMHO, it is not fair and goes against the very definition of stock exchange.
883.
by ldng 16y ago
Node.js neither. It merely passes the request to PHP-FPM. Neat hack but I fail to take it seriously. I don't see the benefit. Maybe I missed something.
884.
by ldng 16y ago
Well, now we see why IPv6 is so slow to be implemented ... After food, oil, here comes the ip speculation. Not viable in the long term but meanwhile some will do a few bucks.
885.
by ldng 16y ago
IMO, just plain wrong.
886.
by ldng 16y ago
I think the point was to trim down the beast. For that you need tradeoff some features I guess. So small int were cut off. As were triggers, views and stored proc. Most of which is hardly used by target audience, webdev that is.
887.
by ldng 16y ago
Well it's true that website design are better, typeface are taken into account. But was referring to a mre recent history, like maybe the last two years. It's really about the font size and not the design. Sadly I find myself zooming more a
888.
Ask HN: Website font's getting smaller overtime?
2 points by ldng 16y ago|3 comments
889.
by ldng 16y ago
Why an expensive Foundation ? Non profit organisation isn't enough ? Do they the plan to be imitating the MozFo / MozCo or Wikipedia system ? They do look like to money laundry system at times to me. I'm not a huge fan from a FOSS point of
890.
by ldng 16y ago
I think they are just starting to understand the amplitude of their mistake.
891.
by ldng 16y ago
I would answer that implementing this strategy can't be a short term plan. This will take time to put in place meanwhile a lot of executives can change. Is it wise to rely on a relationship between one executive and another company as a lon
892.
by ldng 16y ago
Ok, maybe. That bring then the question why nobody wants WP7. Maybe one possible explanation can be find here : http://www.asymco.com/2011/02/11/in-memoriam-microsofts-prev...
893.
by ldng 16y ago
Could you elaborate on that please ? Personally I fail to see in what this choice is better, maybe I missed something.
894.
by ldng 16y ago
Why do I have this feeling that it's the beginning of Nokia retreating from OSS world ? It looks like Nokia is about to announce an all out on WP7. Is that surprising given Stephen Elop background ? We'll see if it's such a good idea. I per
895.
by ldng 16y ago
Here is what I've commented on matt's blog : Well, you're Google is better, but, expectations are higher as is the number of Google employees. So when we see the same content farm again and again during weeks without any action being taken,
896.
by ldng 16y ago
It looks more like UK TC and there's even a France TC ! I think nobody know about them. [edit] Well not only UK, first page just happened to be very UK oriented but if you read further there is a bit more diversity.
897.
by ldng 16y ago
I agree, but developers have enough on their plate and knowing how to administer your workstation isn't the same as administrating a server. That said, allowing user system wide installation could be possible. I think, at least under Linux,
898.
by ldng 16y ago
Well, if you had uptreamed your fixes against 1.2, they would be in 1.3, wouldn't they ? I find it a poor excuse for not upgrade assuming API and ABI are stable. It's just laziness. It's easier because that way you don't have to argue with
899.
by ldng 16y ago
Maybe you should ponderate by total received content weight. It's not perfect but still give you a clue. I mean, not just page size but images and css as well.
900.
by ldng 16y ago
I didn't there wasn't, just that the need better promotion. Call it screencast if you wish. They need Promotive Passionate Users. [edit] I'm gonna pick a little bit on Catalyst and do a quick surface review at website level from a non-Perli

More ›