Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lcnPylGDnU4H9OF
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
347 ms
·
2881.
▲
by
lcnPylGDnU4H9OF
5y ago
What an alliterative assertion that would be.
2882.
▲
by
lcnPylGDnU4H9OF
5y ago
I have difficulty following this argument. It seems to me that if I were to apply this to myself that I would appear as a victim of "math work", where I have a background / life story that pushes me to "want" to do
2883.
▲
by
lcnPylGDnU4H9OF
5y ago
> feels like click-bait That seems like a good way to put it to me. In particular, when it's at the top of the comment, it comes off as a prompt to the reader that they should buckle up for something spicy.
2884.
▲
by
lcnPylGDnU4H9OF
5y ago
I would agree with this take but there's still a point about why I worded it the way I did. I thought about wording it differently (e.g., a person will behave professionally until ...) to help illustrate that but the way I chose to w
2885.
▲
by
lcnPylGDnU4H9OF
5y ago
If someone swung a few-feet-long light aluminum pole at my face as hard as they could I imagine I'd try to move my face out of the way. Granted, I'm assuming that the "strangers" as alluded to in the post you're res
2886.
▲
by
lcnPylGDnU4H9OF
5y ago
> If you are both professionals, it's a cathartic experience that supports your remaining coworkers. If they are not professional, they weren't going to give you a good reference anyway. It seems to me that the author is sugges
2887.
▲
by
lcnPylGDnU4H9OF
5y ago
Consider that it's just an abstraction for "immaturity" and it seems to make more sense. They're not intending to shame someone - except perhaps themselves - for being a baby, they're just describing behavior (albei