Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lbotos
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
41 ms
·
511.
▲
by
lbotos
4y ago
If the business users never need to write, just read, then you could set the projects to public (if your instance is in a private network) and then people can have vis, and you don't need seats for those who aren't writing . I th
512.
▲
by
lbotos
4y ago
I work at GitLab, but curious what your use case is for just VCS ? I assume your company has other solutions for the software lifecycle that you are happy with? Depending on the size of your org, If it's small GitLab CE is free and ca
513.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
> And what if I’m not tracking that in such detail or even thinking about viewing it like that because it’s a side project? Make it private like you are doing? If you don't want someone to perceive something about you, then don
514.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
Sure, if you don't want people to look at your code, don't make it public? I'd argue with you that a GitHub profile could be a useful signal, but it's not a given. As a hiring manager: - If they don't have a GH pr
515.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
Make a readme that says "This project is me exploring how to do Y so I can learn the ins and outs". Solved.
516.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
You can do that or you could also put a readme on your GitHub that it's a place where you explore hobby projects and you are interested in "x, y, and z". When I go to a GitHub as a hiring manager, I try to get as much signal
517.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
I'd advise against MXRoute: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30225685 Maybe you will have a better time than I, but MXRoute is more opinionated than I'd like my mail provider to be. If you are ruling out Mig
518.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
Correct me if I'm wrong, but someone could fork Eth, and write code to "release these funds" back to their "owners" right? Adoption of this fork would be the critical factor, but if enough money gets locked up, it g
519.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
On re-reading, you are right!
520.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
good theory, but dots don't matter in gmail addresses: https://support.google.com/mail/answer/7436150?hl=en
521.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
Appreciate your final question here and I wasn't able to answer "why" but this document on page 12 https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p525.pdf explains that you won't pay tax on ISOs at grant. Wis
522.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
Do note that Tiller and Personal Capital both use(d?) the same mechanism to scrape data: Yodlee https://www.yodlee.com/
523.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
I assume you mean because the extra money that I'm putting into my house could make more money in the market so instead of a 13th payment, get gains in the market?
524.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
Thank you for clarifying. You are a bit wrong, and I'm not a tax accountant, but speaking from experience as someone who has had options that have vested and exercised in startups, and have paid taxes on them. I appreciate you engaging
525.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
The most sad part is, while I'm not OP, I had a bank that supported bi-weekly payments, my mortgage was sold, and the new bank doesn't . What a kick in the pants!
526.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
This is going to sound mean but the more you talk the more confused I am about your original point. Please understand, I am trying to understand you. You originally said: > options being cheaper to purchase means a larger tax bill when
527.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
An options contract is the right to purchase shares at a certain price. Your vesting gives you the right to purchase more shares. If you do not purchase those shares, there was no gain, so there was no tax.
528.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
I'm not sure what you mean. You aren't taxed when options vest because there was no gain. Only when you exercise options, and you will be taxed on the gain. So if you make more money, sure your tax will be higher. RSUs are taxed a
529.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
It's fascinating because the 2 YC backed startups I worked for both offered early exercise. Not saying you are wrong, In my n = 2 experience, I thought it was in the "YC Playbook".
530.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
FTA: > It was to determine how well the HRVs How many of those homes tested installed a proper mechanical ventilation system? Anyone that is serious about air tightness will tell you that you need to manage the air transfer with an HRV
531.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
If I have information that the price of x coin is going to go up and my friend knows I know, then they just need to follow my trades and they can make money too. If enough people follow my trades then this can generate demand and actually a
532.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
Bitbucket was also an acquisition (Most of their offerings were acquisitions). https://techcrunch.com/2010/09/29/atlassian-buys-mercurial-p...
533.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
> Why should I shoulder the responsibility for people's poor life choices. You do know how private insurance works right? Someone makes an insurance company. Then they sit down and figure out the probabilities of things happening to
534.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
Google is budgeting for more expensive engineers, so they end up hiring less.
535.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
I agree. So should that person get a "skip the vetting process" pass? At my current org, they don't. They go through the hiring process like everyone else, and the person that recommended them is not involved until they are h
536.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
Sure, but at the other end of the spectrum you get "know a guy" interviews where interviewers just hire their friends if they are the only person in the hiring process. Where I work (and even other co's my friends work at) ev
537.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
1. Often, legally, firing people is harder than hiring. 2. Hire more, fire fast sounds good on paper but will destroy morale as the team identity will be constantly influx. 3. Engineers will spend less time onboarding newer engineers to
538.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
Sure, but this is HN, I'm optimizing karma for both sides here ;P (I agree with you though, and I eagerly await the scientific studies that quantify Vaping cannabis vs. smoking)
539.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
If you want to use cannabis with low risk to your lungs: edibles. If you want to use cannabis with slightly lower risk than smoking: Vape (dry flower or carts). You can even vape through a bong. If you don't care at all about your lung
540.
▲
by
lbotos
5y ago
I've always felt like Lyn asks 5 whys, and then possibly, how can we use this to make money. I'm not a subscriber so I dunno how profitable she is, but I think she usually tries not to push an angle dogmatically in most of her pub
More ›