lbo

7 ms·

31.
by lbo 15y ago
That seems very likely... His zealotry totally misses the point and comes off as very defensive. My 2 cents: when I saw Exec's real page I thought, "Interesting idea, not for me." When I saw Kyro's redesign I thought "This product seems awe
32.
by lbo 15y ago
I'm working on a site that will solve this exact problem. I aggregate streaming movie sites and let you check off your subscriptions and preferences. I'll be continuously improving recommendation quality as I gather the user-data to pull i
33.
by lbo 15y ago
Awesome. Otherwise the site is excellent.
34.
by lbo 15y ago
I get a large number of false-positives and, interestingly enough, even more false positives for the same search term when searching from my iPhone. As I click on them all, they stop appearing again, but this is quite an annoying experience
35.
by lbo 15y ago
And then != than in his post as well. I think it struck me particularly because it was in the same paragraph that he was discussing his unaccepted correction of the corporate copy :/. Proper spelling and grammar are important even in casual
36.
by lbo 15y ago
This can work with an ad profit-sharing model for people who post content (which is how sites like ustream work, as far as I know), but that model doesn't really extend to article aggregators and I highly doubt a user would donate $1 to the
37.
by lbo 15y ago
Glad to see this blow up in his face. Corporate victimization is a two-way street, and it's a little-discussed fact that companies of all sizes very often find themselves at the mercy of liars like this. At least he didn't sue them and ge