lbatx

10 ms·

61.
by lbatx 9y ago
Yes, and it fits into option #2. It is work directly related to the company. And?
62.
by lbatx 9y ago
Sorry, this isn't the only practical way for software companies. There are three main approaches: no mention at all (vague and bad for all parties), ownership of all related ideas developed on company time/company equipment [this
63.
by lbatx 9y ago
> Termux always pubished me for them so I learned to be precise. I don't think it worked.
64.
by lbatx 9y ago
Do you think that hackers as a market aren't, by near definition, early adopters and want new technology? I don't know who else a 10 year old phone would appeal to but parts of the mass market?
65.
by lbatx 9y ago
Are you presuming they won't drop a robot in the self-driving car to bring you your food?
66.
by lbatx 9y ago
How does the leader give feedback in your model? Can the leader never chime in with some advice that might be helpful to the situation?
67.
by lbatx 10y ago
You sure about that? You sure it's not on the person who, knowing that, still chooses to use Netflix? Note: not defending Netflix's position on VPNs, just pointing out that the user still has free will.
68.
by lbatx 10y ago
I believe subtitling is done from the script for a show, which is why sometimes what is on the screen doesn't match what the actress says. Typically, it's the same concept, just with slightly different words. They probably just lo
69.
by lbatx 10y ago
At my previous company, I was the hiring manager and gave a homework assignment that was targeted a little shorter than you describe, at right about 2-3 hours. I was clear upfront that it would take about that long, though if you wanted to
70.
by lbatx 10y ago
There is something called "lying by omission" or telling the truth, but not the whole truth. Also, if you are told to resign or you will be fired, that's not resigning on your own terms.
71.
by lbatx 10y ago
Because a cop was nice to you once doesn't mean he isn't a bad apple. Just means he was nice to you once.
72.
by lbatx 10y ago
Correct. In addition, someone covering up for a bad apple is, well, a bad apple.
73.
by lbatx 10y ago
Yes, this will deter police from retaliating. Rulings like this in other circuits already have. Will it stop it completely? Of course not. No, they cannot (lawfully) hold you for 24 hours with no reason. Quick lesson (note: everything I say
74.
by lbatx 10y ago
Already done. IBM Watson has been doing this for more than three years. Was world class already in 2014. http://www.businessinsider.com/ibms-watson-may-soon-be-the-b...
75.
by lbatx 10y ago
Sorry for the late reply, but "briefly distracting" tells me it's clear you don't understand "the zone".
76.
by lbatx 10y ago
Why quit the app vs set your status to busy/DND?
77.
by lbatx 10y ago
How is context switching costly for you, but only briefly distracting for your colleague?
78.
by lbatx 10y ago
> I hope not, since that's not a thing that's illegal. It doesn't have to be illegal to be a valid point in a civil suit. Things that are legal can be prohibited by contract. Whether it's illegal or not is irrelevant.
79.
by lbatx 10y ago
I think you did a fine job articulating the difference. It's not the fact that there are bad apples people are angry about (we understand there are bad apples in every profession). It's the absolute lack of accountability that is
80.
by lbatx 10y ago
He was born in 1966. Let's split the difference. (If I were to be a pain, he did literally grow up partially in the 60's, contrary to your flat "no"). Some 60's (including seeing 60's shows in the early 70&#x27
81.
by lbatx 10y ago
What's worse is that this is highly unlikely to be the only case in which Forcelli sent the wrong person to jail. I don't know if he's come to that realization yet.
82.
by lbatx 10y ago
You have to remember he grew up in the 60's and 70's, so you can't use today's cop shows. Back then, they had things like Dragnet and Adam-12, which portrayed things differently.
83.
by lbatx 10y ago
Exactly. Plus the phrasing of the criticism is so odd: "no longer contributing to the business." Let's all accept that as true, so allowing original employees' to purchase for a longer time period simply preserves their
84.
by lbatx 10y ago
The mere fact that he's financing a lawsuit against a major customer/partner of Facebook should be enough to have him removed from the Board. He's actively working against the company's interests.