lazyeye

50 ms·

1. 841.▲
   by lazyeye 4y ago

   Yep...some of the people on the overemployed reddit sub claim to have 4, even 5 full-time remote jobs
2. 842.▲
   by lazyeye 4y ago

   In the context of any other trade relationship would it be acceptable for China to block all access to its own market, whilst still expecting full access everybody elses?
3. 843.▲
   by lazyeye 4y ago

   I've never understood how the people over at https://reddit.com/r/overemployed do it.
4. 844.▲
   by lazyeye 4y ago

   This has to be a generational thing. There is no way a deaf person growing up now is not going to be using the internet.
5. 845.▲
   by lazyeye 4y ago

   Yes the majority of animals die a violent death. If they manage to survive long enough, they get too old to escape a predator.
6. 846.▲
   by lazyeye 4y ago

   There needs to be a new browser standard for sandboxed html files (.htmlsbx files) that only open in a special sandboxed tab with no off-page connectivity allowed.It would be perfect for this.
7. 847.▲
   by lazyeye 4y ago

   I meant coming from a position of concern for injustice rather than risk and self-protection.
8. 848.▲
   by lazyeye 4y ago

   How come the people of Silicon Valley, always so desperately concerned about issues of social justice, never talk about wage inequality? IMO this is an issue for which the scale and impact is far greater than what seems to be the issues of
9. 849.▲
   by lazyeye 4y ago

   Fentanyl is greyzone warfare from the CCP. It's astonishing how complacent the West is.
10. 850.▲
    by lazyeye 4y ago

    Its not a productive use of my time debating whether water is wet.
11. 851.▲
    by lazyeye 4y ago

    Google has no interest in you or your problems. I recommend watching the "Talks at Google" channel on youtube to see the kinds of things that interest the people at Google.
12. 852.▲
    by lazyeye 4y ago

    I'm not going to start debating specifics. Clearly up until very recently Twitter has leaned left. I don't see how anyone with basic comprehension skills can dispute that.
13. 853.▲
    by lazyeye 4y ago

    Have you been paying much attention to what Twitter has been doing for the last few years? Particularly leading up to the last election?
14. 854.▲
    by lazyeye 4y ago

    Note how it's only "partisan" when they are perceived to lean in one particular direction only. Despite multiple very close elections the other side is the "mainstream consensus" of course.
15. 855.▲
    by lazyeye 4y ago

    If they can get something so fundamental to human health so completely wrong for so long, what else are we being lied to about right now?
16. 856.▲
    by lazyeye 4y ago

    Lol
17. 857.▲
    by lazyeye 4y ago

    Neither of us has provided meaningful evidence. We are already on the same level. I havent dragged you anywhere. You've just pulled up a bit of dross from a highly partisan organisation and are claiming that this is proof of something
18. 858.▲
    by lazyeye 4y ago

    Why do (extremely) simple concepts like this need a 3rd party to support them? The kind of "evidence" that is normally presented is typically provided by 3rd-rate activist researchers, attracted to dogma, and who simply come to wh
19. 859.▲
    by lazyeye 4y ago

    Again, nonsense. You could make these kind of claims along any lines, for example, christians are the target of discrimination for their beliefs etc. You just choose the ones that align with left-wing ideology and everything else is "
20. 860.▲
    by lazyeye 4y ago

    Yes I had. I don't think you are very good at debating.
21. 861.▲
    by lazyeye 4y ago

    Nonsense. You just define the rules such that this is the conclusion ("everyone that disagrees with me is a nazi etc...")
22. 862.▲
    by lazyeye 4y ago

    If the rules are not being applied equally across the political spectrum then your comment is simply obsfucation and misdirection. Completely missing the point.
23. 863.▲
    by lazyeye 4y ago

    No you price some domains higher because you can and you want to make more money.
24. 864.▲
    by lazyeye 4y ago

    Well I dont know what else to say to someone who thinks they are informed, when they aren't and who refuses to look elsewhere. Ok to summarise...(you really have to read the book to get the detail so this is just a skim) Joe Biden home
25. 865.▲
    by lazyeye 4y ago

    It sounds to me like you are just providing a rationalisation for a closed mind. There are plenty of smart people on the right, and lots of bad behaviour on the left that needs highlighting (and vice versa). And of course it's only pe
26. 866.▲
    by lazyeye 4y ago

    "were Hunter Biden dick pics..." This is a completely false representation. The laptop provided clear and direct evidence of the Biden family influence-peddling scheme with lots of shady people, and notably America's primary
27. 867.▲
    by lazyeye 4y ago

    I wonder what those reasons were such that they couldn't be stated openly and instead they needed some unrelated pretext to sack him?
28. 868.▲
    by lazyeye 4y ago

    It may not have been celebrated but we can say with absolute certainty he wouldn't have been sacked.
29. 869.▲
    by lazyeye 4y ago

    Never forget Apple is the company that provides support for the CCP in the oppression it's citizens. But at least they take a stand on dumb movie quotes though...
30. 870.▲
    by lazyeye 4y ago

    Here's the reviews of "Laptop from Hell" https://www.amazon.com/Laptop-Hell-Hunter-Secrets-President/...