lazugod

35 ms·

301.
by lazugod 15y ago
Why not? I don't learn anything from seeing the username of whoever posted "+1".
302.
by lazugod 15y ago
...runs exclusively on Windows, whereas the existing TextMate runs exclusively on OS X. Different platforms and different audiences, mate.
303.
by lazugod 15y ago
People expect their pets to be happy based on human features (shape of the mouth and eyebrows), which don't correspond to the actual mood of the pet.
304.
by lazugod 15y ago
That would not be discoverable.
305.
by lazugod 15y ago
It's even funnier with the OP's other post in context: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2933277
306.
by lazugod 15y ago
If a transcript is available, why isn't it posted as well?
307.
by lazugod 15y ago
Or he could actually be asking how he was caught.
308.
by lazugod 15y ago
The WSJ doesn't already have the capability to take in and report directly on confidential leaks?
309.
by lazugod 16y ago
This is the intent, isn't it? Force people to disagree by replying.
310.
by lazugod 16y ago
You'd think that text posts (like the parent) that have links within them would make their links clickable once they pass some karma threshold.
311.
by lazugod 16y ago
Discussion here: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2377109
312.
by lazugod 16y ago
Firefox is a browser; how do you delete spam from a browser?
313.
by lazugod 16y ago
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2280409
314.
by lazugod 16y ago
You haven't made an argument why such would be considered "rot".
315.
by lazugod 16y ago
It isn't clear whether Bing was taking special interest in click data off of Google searches, or giving it special weight in its own results. Google seemed to think so, but even if Microsoft was treating the data they received as neutrally
316.
by lazugod 16y ago
Agreed. That ambiguity is why Google's PR response makes sense.
317.
by lazugod 16y ago
Are you advocating using two hands, or none at all?
318.
by lazugod 16y ago
And depending on the state of Yahoo's (or Lycos' or Altavista's) robots.txt at the time, that may be defendable.
319.
by lazugod 16y ago
Driving alone is at odds with any sort of mobile computing.
320.
by lazugod 16y ago
There were cases where the linked duplicates would have only one or two comments. It was annoying to see them listed - not because there is nothing to read, but because it's a vote of no-confidence that those particular posts would have eve
321.
by lazugod 16y ago
To what extent do people stylize their emails?
322.
by lazugod 16y ago
Still to this day there is a lot of miscommunication happening due to the lack of intonation in communication mediums such as text messages and emails. People think I am ‘mad’ all the time because I send brief emails, or they t
323.
by lazugod 16y ago
What's the significance of this release being seven times larger?
324.
by lazugod 16y ago
Adobe is a type of brick, so not particularly soft.
325.
by lazugod 16y ago
Get away with what?
326.
by lazugod 16y ago
There's a conversion tool available for WebP now: http://code.google.com/speed/webp/download.html
327.
by lazugod 16y ago
There's Amaya ( http://www.w3.org/Amaya/ ), the browser that the W3C uses for experimentation. I'm confused by your question, though; are you implying that webkit is a standard DOM engine, or asking? Webkit isn't a standard, it's merely bro
328.
by lazugod 16y ago
Same discussion under a less murderous title here: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1744237
329.
by lazugod 16y ago
URLs in submissions don't get parsed into links. From the FAQ: Don't abuse the text field in the submission form to add commentary to links. The text field is for starting discussions. If you're submitting a link, put it in the url fiel
330.
by lazugod 16y ago
Er, no. AMC owns the studio that produces Mad Men, so their contact with Youtube would have chosen to collect the ad money - not a computer making that decision.

More ›