Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lavezzi
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
lavezzi
1y ago
I don't believe they did, and I also believe they have known about this issue for a long time, and they should have been required to disclose their mandatory 8k a lot earlier.
62.
▲
by
lavezzi
1y ago
You don't think Coinbase is responsible for restricting access to member data for support agents?
63.
▲
by
lavezzi
1y ago
Very recently, because historically the majority of people engaging in it aren't looking to profit from piracy. The general public has been lectured for decades about how piracy is morally wrong, but as soon as startups and corporation
64.
▲
by
lavezzi
1y ago
There's tonnes, this is a baffling question.
65.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
You can critically think for yourself, the video is there for anyone to watch. Why do you need 'reputable media' to confirm things for you? Especially since I'm sure you will denounce any source provided as non-reputable. ht
66.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
> he would need all of the MAGA people to buy his cars, and China. Everyone in those groups would be behind a guy throwing Nazi salutes?
67.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
> Elon’s antics certainly haven’t helped things Doing Nazi salutes might drive sales in the US, but this is the understatement of the year.
68.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
Pathetic.
69.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
> Unique take to be sure, but sharing because it was interesting. I think the most interesting point in this is the level in which supporters have stooped to provide 'justifiable' arguments.
70.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
> The difference is it's not using tax money. Using tax money is the entire premise for calling it "brazen corruption". Maybe in this article, but the real corruption is in the insider trading.
71.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
What exactly do you think they have been doing with the tariffs, and these performative announcements with stock market impacts that were a frequent occurrence during his first term in office? But I absolutely guarantee that the final coins
72.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
> Or, and here me out, those are the 5 biggest crypto coins. How long has Cardano been a top five coin? Did you look at the marketcap chart and assume it had been there longer than a few days? Who owns the majority of Ripple? > So if
73.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
It also doesn't mean anyone he is related to has divested either.
74.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
And that's good enough for you is it? Unverified claims, and no insight into who else benefits from his decisions? His venture firm (Craft Ventures) previously invested in Bitwise Asset Management, and their top holdings include Bitcoi
75.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
> You lack the gift of nuance No, I lack patience for obvious bullshit, and to even attempt to defend such an obvious grift is genuinely pathetic. > Trump didn't suggest it was an actual investment vehicle, also he did it out of
76.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
> Because he didn't. Really not sure why you say that with such authority. https://youtu.be/EqizJTbxAEM?t=3891
77.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
> Great take regarding 1 and 2. lmao, where is the great take? Regardless of whether this was marketed as as memecoin or a "financial instrument to help finance small Argentinan enterprises" they are fundamentally the same thin
78.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
> Obviously it's just a memecoin, but that's what Milei's tweet said, he never mentioned "meme" in his tweet unlike Trump. Who gives a shit? Let's stop pretending that utilising the word 'meme' in
79.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
You can easily get an API key from 2Captcha, AntiCap, CapSolver, etc. - it costs basically nothing and it works.
80.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
> 2. Trump tweeted about $TRUMP BEFORE stepping into office, Milei is already the president of Argentina. This constitutes an obvious ethical violation, and possibly a legal one as well. As in three days before Trump's inauguration?
81.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
> It's so transparently a way for Trump to extract money from his constituents that a part of me wants to respect it. It's also a potential rail to launder bribes and campaign funding, you name it.
82.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
> I never claimed it was the main reason people voted for him, that's your straw man argument. I never said you claimed that either. But if "people voted for it" (with the "it" being DOGE or whatever it was calle
83.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
Citations? As far as I can tell, the first mention of a "Department of Government Efficiency" came from a Musk tweet a few weeks before the election. And Trump announced he would implement the idea during an announcement in early
84.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
I know you were trying to be smart here, but this isn't about debating the outcome of the election, that transition was already handled in a peaceful manner.
85.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
Cutting edge tech like paying cents to captcha solving services?!
86.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tG3oAvkUadc
87.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
Aside from literally collapsing it has in all other definitions.
88.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
Not everything is a conspiracy. It makes logical sense that if something gets popular very quickly, people are going to want to talk about it.
89.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
But they are exclusively the majority on X
90.
▲
by
lavezzi
2y ago
480 million of those are likely bots
More ›