Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
latexr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
35 ms
·
901.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
Not sure why you’re telling me that. I’m not criticising CAPTCHA, my parent comment was.
902.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
The point I was making is that you’re criticising something while suggesting something else even easier to bypass.
903.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
What a rotten state of affairs that we’re now openly suggesting producing garbage with the least effort possible and selling it until caught. We used to criticise those who did that, calling them spammers and scammers and worse. Now, “telli
904.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
> useless CAPTCHAS (any sufficiently advanced bot can get around any CAPTCHA anyway). We solved this at our startup by (…). Of course this is easy to get around if the bot knows what you’re doing So, by your own admission, your solution
905.
▲
Apple releases iOS 18 security updates for iOS 26 holdouts
(sixcolors.com)
2 points
by
latexr
7mo ago
|
1 comments
906.
▲
Cindy Cohn of the EFF Interviewed by Jon Stewart on the Daily Show [video]
(youtube.com)
36 points
by
latexr
7mo ago
|
1 comments
907.
▲
Tom Scott is back on YouTube [video]
(youtube.com)
34 points
by
latexr
7mo ago
|
8 comments
908.
▲
The Internet Is a UGC Reaction Video Now
(joanwestenberg.com)
3 points
by
latexr
7mo ago
|
0 comments
909.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
You’re making a lot of assumptions. They could just stop visiting HN. They don’t even need a “plan” or an alternative, they can just stop.
910.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
The animation at the top keeps pushing the rest of the page up and down. Terrible experience. Apart from that, don’t waste your time. This is an April Fools. https://github.com/buildaloud/safe-oss-forever/?tab=read
911.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
It’s the same thing. Say you have a bill of 120€/year. On average that comes to 10€/month (120€ divided by 12 months). If you have save 10% a month you save 1€, which after 12 months becomes a saving of 12€. Now do that yearly: 10
912.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
That’s almost literal. Sam Altman has admitted early on their goal was to invent AGI and then ask it how to make money. https://www.startupbell.net/post/sam-altman-told-investors-b...
913.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
I find it fascinating how you can read someone’s own definition of a subjective concept and immediately make wrong assertions about them and their opinions and do so by employing a No True Scotsman, a logical fallacy so basic one learns it
914.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
> You don't have to pick on camp over the other. In my opinion, if you want to make a good product for a user, you should also treat the code you produce for them as your craft. There is no substitute for high quality work. Exactly,
915.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
> The opposite. Watching borderline criminal people and even actual criminals be much more successful than me honestly makes me depressed and sometimes makes me curse my upbringing. I could be a lot more successful than I am right now if
916.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
And not even verifying it before publishing.
917.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
> can't say I 'loved' the ads, but (…) What you’re saying is that you tolerated the ads and that you think they were an acceptable tradeoff for what you got in return. None of that is love . Loving the ads would mean yo
918.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
> In trying to come up with some good examples I asked LLMs. (…) > So I tried to cast the net more broadly and asked LLMs (…) > EDIT: also hunted down several mistakes, as one would expect from LLMs; thanks to commenters. This is a
919.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
Again, none of that contradicts what I said. It frankly feels like you’re trying hard to justify to yourself why you do things you know deep down aren’t right. You do you, whatever helps you sleep at night and get through the day, I guess.
920.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
> We know many of you loved the ads Who are these “many” mythical consumers who are using a product with ads and love the ads? I call bullshit. If you’re one of those people, please make yourself known. I’d like to ask some questions.
921.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
Pretty bare. It explains the concept but there’s no usage examples so it’s not really clear if or how it’s better than the alternative. Only way to continue is by making an account.
922.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
They made a movie to make money. I doubt anyone holding the purse strings cared one iota if that bit were corrected or not. It’s not really a retcon either because they didn’t change anything.
923.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
I agree. But that doesn’t contradict my point at all. Two things can be true at once.
924.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
> The fact is though, that those who expressed concerns about Microsoft - in that particular thread, and in others - were generally ridiculed in roughly the tone I imitated in my original post. The fact the top voted comments are wary of
925.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
> I wouldn't want a touchscreen MBP even if it was free, anyone else feel similar? I don’t want a touchscreen MBP, but as long as touching the screen is an optional interaction and everything else is the same, I see no reason to rej
926.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
At a certain point, quotes (like any other part of language) get a new meaning, sometimes the opposite of what they originally stood for. Like any popular saying, whatever they were in reference to is forgotten and they stand and are interp
927.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
Ignoring the fact that your description is far from absolute (“society” isn’t a single thing; there are—and I’ve been in—smaller scale societies which do work together for the collective good) and that shrugging off the situation only makes
928.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
Like I said (emphasis added): > I go back to check and find out that (…) the discussions had both people in favour and against . The point is that “everyone here thought” complaints have so far never been true. > I don't think i
929.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
> the common sentiment on the forum was that Microsoft of 2010s was not Ballmer’s Microsoft, and the unsavoury anticompetitive behaviours had been done away with. Maybe it was a common sentiment, but clearly not the . Again, we can se
930.
▲
by
latexr
7mo ago
> ca. everyone here Every time someone claims “everyone on HN thought X”, I go back to check and find out that it was not true and that the discussions had both people in favour and against. Every time. But this case is particularly ba
More ›