Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
latchkey
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
50 ms
·
781.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
We're not testing Java, we're testing your code which is a method to add items to a list. If it passes the tests, great. If there is a bug in the JVM, maybe it picks it up or doesn't. That doesn't negate the need for the
782.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
If I have a method wrapped around adding items to a list, then I'd call that method with random data. Then, I'd call the method that gets the items from the list and I'd check that the order is consistent. Now, you're te
783.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
Out of curiosity, what would you spray? (Probably not a good idea, there are camera's everywhere.)
784.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
Hey, me too! SMB/OB/PL.
785.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
Then learn PyTorch. The hardware between brands is fundamentally different. There isn't a standard like x86 for CPUs. So, while you may use something like HIPIFY to translate your code between APIs, at least with GPU programming, it ma
786.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
Do you remember when there was a brief bug in Netscape that enabled multiple <title> tags to effectively animate the window title? That was a fun one.
787.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
Cyanide usage is pretty bad too.
788.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
Maybe it is just me, but I can't read the text in the code because the font is nearly white on white.
789.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
I was tasked with getting 20,000 PS5 APU's online. ASRock BC-250. Each chassis had 12 independent blades and in order to save money, we decided to not put SSD/NVMe into them and iPXE boot them instead. Each APU had 16GB of memory,
790.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
Yes, that is about all you need on it.
791.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
True on all counts. But the lowest effort is "just turn off dependabot", which is what I suspect most of the people trying to get past SOC2 will do (like myself).
792.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
I'm going through SOC2 right now, and it is essentially requiring it to be enabled. I'll just do the minimal to pass, but it isn't something you can just disable in some cases.
793.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
Testing isn't trivial, it can be downright difficult. But if you test for those invalid states, the reasons are expected.
794.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
I used to code this way, then I started to write tests, as I was writing my code. I could ensure the behavior was expected with the test. If the code wasn't easily testable, I would refactor it right way and that would generally leave
795.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
I'm not disagreeing with you and it is weird that my comment above got flagged given that I'm not attacking you. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
796.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
My mistake, I shouldn't have put a number there since that is what you focused on. Rewriting it in assembly is the way to go, but that has other tradeoffs.
797.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
The real question isn’t whether they would choose it, but whether they’d be willing to evaluate it. Given their past behavior, as I mentioned above, it seems they are open to assessing options and selecting the best tool for the job.
798.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
Microsoft has a massive investment in C#, but they still evaluated (and picked) golang.
799.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
Gauntlet, the CoffeeScript of golang, seems to have an interesting approach: https://gauntletlang.gitbook.io/docs/advanced-features/try-s...
800.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
Does it matter? Today, they get a 10x improvement by switching. Mission accomplished. X years from now, another language will come along and then they can switch to that for whatever benefit it has. It is just the nature of these things in
801.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
"A faster bootstrap time is a crucial requirement to support this dynamic scaling strategy." Google AppEngine has been doing this successfully for a decade. It is not easy, but it is possible.
802.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
> I don't see any reason to evaluate Go at all. https://devblogs.microsoft.com/typescript/typescript-native-...
803.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
Which Linux?
804.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
Exactly. The problem is volume on exchanges to unload what you've mined. Some of these tokens only have a few thousand a day and any selling risks dumping the entire market. If you can steal the compute, sure, that is one thing, but it
805.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
These sorts of articles always seem suspect to me. Blame the miners is a great trope. There really aren't any valuable crypto's being mined on CPU/GPU any longer. After ETH switched from PoW to PoS, it decimated the whole min
806.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
> college club management That’s what I’d search for on Google. The first result [0] already has some useful suggestions, and I’m sure there are plenty more out there if you want to dig deeper. You might feel your idea is more complete
807.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
I suggest you do some research into this before you start building anything. Your idea is not novel and it is a crowded space already.
808.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
There are a ton of sites that do club management. Have you investigated any of them first?
809.
▲
ChatGPT's Em Dash Habit: A Training Artifact or Design Choice?
(community.openai.com)
6 points
by
latchkey
1y ago
|
0 comments
810.
▲
by
latchkey
1y ago
What is the instructions to tell it to never add it in? I've been trying various things, and not successful yet.
More ›