Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lapcat
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
21 ms
·
421.
▲
by
lapcat
8mo ago
It can't cost that much if some random blogger can do it.
422.
▲
by
lapcat
8mo ago
I didn't claim that it's implausible. I asked a question. On the other hand, it's not that implausible either that someone might be running Google Chrome, Windows, Mac, etc. We know that many HN commenters do. Thus, while the
423.
▲
by
lapcat
8mo ago
> This is why I only run open source extensions that I can actually audit. How far does your principle extend? To your web browser too? Google Chrome itself is partly but not entirely open source. Your operating system? Only Linux? Mac a
424.
▲
by
lapcat
8mo ago
> We built an automated scanning pipeline that runs Chrome inside a Docker container, routes all traffic through a man‑in‑the‑middle (MITM) proxy, and watches for outbound requests that correlate with the length of the URLs we feed it. T
425.
▲
by
lapcat
8mo ago
> it’s a bit incendiary > I also think it overstates the case I think it's a mistake to defend and/or "reinterpret" the hype, which is not helping to promote the technology to people who aren't bandwagoners. I
426.
▲
by
lapcat
8mo ago
What you just said seems reasonable. However, what the earlier commenter said, which led to this subthread, seems unreasonable: those people unwilling to try the tools "are absolutely going to get left in the dust." Returning to t
427.
▲
by
lapcat
8mo ago
I’m not sure your analogy is applicable here. The introduction of the App Store did not increase developer productivity per se. If anything, it decreased developer productivity, because unless you were already already a Mac developer, you h
428.
▲
by
lapcat
9mo ago
I wrote an erroneous comment in haste, which I regret. However, this kind of thing happens countless times every day on HN. It's not unusual. Except perhaps the regret part: unlike me, many of those other commenters admit no error and
429.
▲
by
lapcat
9mo ago
> The fact that you have now replied—which automatically disables comment deletion—is the only thing that prevented my removing it just now. So great job. How was I supposed to know that you intended to delete it? In any case, you may st
430.
▲
by
lapcat
9mo ago
I made the mistake of trying to skim the code hastily before I had to leave to run an errand, and yes it turns out I was wrong, but please refrain from the personal comments, and no, I don't have any such "habit."
431.
▲
by
lapcat
9mo ago
[removed]
432.
▲
by
lapcat
9mo ago
> Rachel has blogged quite a bit about blocking badly behaved RSS Clients in recent years. Unfortunately that blocking is buggy and overzealous. I just gave up eventually and unsubscribed from the RSS feed.
433.
▲
by
lapcat
9mo ago
> Feels like a few things are getting conflated. By whom? > DFU the protocol isn’t the issue I never said it was. > the ambiguity is around which physical port actually exposes DFU at boot Yes. > This reads less like “DFU is bro
434.
▲
by
lapcat
9mo ago
> Theory makes predictions (logical implications), and if you empirically find contradictory evidence, the theory is proven incorrect. Of course. But again, that is not the form of argumentation known as reductio ad absurdum. Reductio
435.
▲
by
lapcat
9mo ago
> To the article of this piece: are you enlightened yet? > Have you decided yet to stop buying Apple hardware? I'm a professional developer of Mac and iOS software, so I'm enlightened enough to just complain on my blog and t
436.
▲
by
lapcat
9mo ago
> MacBook Pros {M1 Pro, M1 Max, M3 Max, M4, M4 Max} I have an M4 Pro, so you have not tested with my specific model. > I am sure many other people would have noticed if the DFU port was marked incorrectly. Why? Again, I'm not gen
437.
▲
by
lapcat
9mo ago
You can turn every empirical theory into a so-called "reductio ad absurdum" by phrasing the results of empirical tests as a premise in the argument, but that is itself totally absurd and a mockery of the logical idea.
438.
▲
by
lapcat
9mo ago
> I simply use the port that is closest to the MagSafe. According to Apple, that's actually the DFU port. In any case, Apple's docs don't say that you always have to use the same port with an external drive.
439.
▲
by
lapcat
9mo ago
> One can logically disprove a theory You haven't done so. > reductio ad absurdum You misunderstand what this is. You suggested in another comment that I test the theory by trying the DFU process, but that is not reductio ad ab
440.
▲
by
lapcat
9mo ago
> it is easy to refute your theory. Just do a DFU with the port indicated by Apple No, it's not easy. I just said, in the comment you replied to, "I'm not even sure that I have all the prerequisites on hand." > I
441.
▲
by
lapcat
9mo ago
> it could be for any number of reasons only one of which has to do with using the DFU port Any number? How about naming them. Name one. People in the comments here claim I'm wrong but totally hand-wave away my issue.
442.
▲
by
lapcat
9mo ago
> I would simply say: "Always use the same port for booting and installation." Which usually simplifies the process. That would be even worse than not being able to update macOS on the DFU port. I'm supposed to remember wh
443.
▲
by
lapcat
9mo ago
> They are talking about "storage devices" in that context, which is a total misread What misread are you talking about? I'm talking about storage devices because the documentation says you can't update macOS on an ex
444.
▲
by
lapcat
9mo ago
> it does not appear the root cause is which port is DFU, but a misunderstanding of the DFU process by the blogpost. The blog post does not even discuss the DFU process.
445.
▲
by
lapcat
9mo ago
> It appears that the author is directly contradicting your read. Correct.
446.
▲
by
lapcat
9mo ago
> The author did not test the DFU flow I'd rather not. I'm not even sure that I have all the prerequisites on hand. > I'm not sure why they're blaming the DFU port documentation. 1) The documentation says that macO
447.
▲
by
lapcat
9mo ago
> What applications to you make and where might I find them? https://underpassapp.com
448.
▲
by
lapcat
9mo ago
Did you and the other replier stop reading my comment after the first sentence? Because the second and following sentences make very clear—e.g., "distribute"—that I was talking about apps developed and sold by me.
449.
▲
by
lapcat
9mo ago
It can cause problems to flip off the internet when you already have open connections, though there are also API to detect changes in network availability. But I don't see that as a significant problem for "I turn off my WiFi now
450.
▲
by
lapcat
9mo ago
I wrote them. I'm baffled by your question.
More ›