Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
landon32
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
91.
▲
by
landon32
9y ago
No, because females have different life experiences than males. There is no way around that. Society treats females and males differently from birth. Running short on time, but this page links to a bunch of relevant studies: http:/&#x
92.
▲
by
landon32
9y ago
Sounds like they were targeting ecommerce though, and since Amazon added reviews and was a winner in that space they had no chance with that market.
93.
▲
by
landon32
9y ago
Have you thought about setting up a system like this with another freelance friend? Every day you could hop on a call with them and tell them your goals. You can help each other flesh out task lists and determine 'pomodoro-like chunks&
94.
▲
by
landon32
9y ago
Imagine you are trying to use a neural network to classify single bit data as either being 1 or 0 (I know you obviously don't need a neural net for this, but it's an example). Aside from not needing a very deep network, you would
95.
▲
by
landon32
9y ago
Adding on to this: The human ancestors before this single instance were all from Africa. This title picks one particular definition of human and uses that as the basis for its claim. The ancestors of this species were certainly from Africa,
96.
▲
by
landon32
9y ago
This reminds me a lot about the introduction to a book called 15 commitments of conscious leadership. If you enjoyed this article, check out that book! It's very good.
97.
▲
by
landon32
9y ago
I think usually if a problem is more solvable by a neural network than a decision tree, there is an underlying reason. Neural nets and decision trees work in very different ways. Take image classification as an example. CNNs can do it by fi
98.
▲
by
landon32
10y ago
You have some interesting points. Re: DaVinci, do you think it's possible that he knew most of his ideas were bad? I write down every product idea I have, but I know that maybe 1 in 10 would actually be used by people and maybe 1 in 10
99.
▲
by
landon32
10y ago
I don't think they should be stigmatized, but I also don't think that was really what pg meant to do. How much was Newton able to contribute to theology and chemistry, compared to how much he contributed to physics? Sure, maybe he
100.
▲
by
landon32
10y ago
I think you're talking about a different type of mistake than nitrogen is. You seem to be talking about accidental discoveries, or discoveries that were discovered while using mistaken techniques. When Alexander Fleming discovered that