lambdaba

71 ms·

901.
by lambdaba 6y ago
You don't really, my theory is sometimes the auditory part takes over mid-sentence, whereas when I'm in my usual visual mode the errors stand out immediately.
902.
by lambdaba 6y ago
That's flattering as I'm not a native speaker :)
903.
by lambdaba 6y ago
I'm just making a point that many happy Vim users can relate to. To me it was pure serendipity. Nano on the other hand wouldn't have led me anywhere. Apparently that is worthy of downvoting to some.
904.
by lambdaba 6y ago
As another user suggested, I spelt it phonetically for no reason...
905.
by lambdaba 6y ago
Thanks for the charitable explanation. I sometimes spell phonetically for no reason.
906.
by lambdaba 6y ago
It baffles me you're being downvoted for this.
907.
by lambdaba 6y ago
If nano would have been the default, I'm not sure I would of learned vi. Just a thought.
908.
by lambdaba 6y ago
Exactly. The same applies to the individual, and exposure to bugs is beneficial to the immune system https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hygiene_hypothesis
909.
by lambdaba 6y ago
Has there been any proof of infection via eyes? The virus needs to settle in the airways to reach the level of infection. I understand people's reaction, it's hard to sort all the messages from the media & health authorities,
910.
by lambdaba 6y ago
Exactly. I would be a disaster if the viruses were indeed viable this way, I think excessive hygiene actually harms the immune system by restricting eustress from other bugs.
911.
by lambdaba 6y ago
I also want to point out that a respiratory virus's #1 (or perhaps only) means of transmission is via the airways, I don't think it's reasonable to expect even licking your fingers would result in an infection. I'm open
912.
by lambdaba 6y ago
I agree with you, this talk of infection via objects is a remnant of the early paranoia around the virus.
913.
by lambdaba 6y ago
Infection requires a certain level of exposure that you're unlikely (I would say, impossible) to reach merely by touching (unless it's a droplet and you shove it up your nose or something...).
914.
by lambdaba 6y ago
Likely even more if they're fed their natural (100% meat-based) diet, no wonder pets get all the same diseases as we do when they're fed typical industrial pet food + scraps.
915.
by lambdaba 6y ago
Why do you think they are? I ask because I haven't researched beyond the initial news stories.
916.
Bloop(en.wikipedia.org)
3 points by lambdaba 6y ago|0 comments
917.
by lambdaba 7y ago
I had a similar feeling for the language and I can assure you you do get used to it, and that it's probably not the syntax that's making it difficult but understanding the programming model. As for not being machine-editable, the
918.
by lambdaba 7y ago
in (some) order of importance: - lots of sun WITHOUT sunscreen (diet and/or astaxanthin prevent sunburn), need cholesterol to biosynthesize vit. d - reduce glucose spikes / increase insulin sensitivity with low-carb diet - elimina
919.
by lambdaba 7y ago
Excellent idea and we'll surely be seeing something like this, there are AR apps that already map facial expressions to avatars. Downside could be some uncanny valley if the models are not very high quality. But if I had to make a pred
920.
by lambdaba 7y ago
> It certainly has drawbacks. (Ex: we subsidize too much corn and wheat.) Huge drawback right here, corn (high fructose corn syrup, corn itself) and wheat are both at the center of the obesity epidemic and health crisis. It's a poin
921.
by lambdaba 7y ago
I'm not a professional researcher on this topic, just an passionate observer and n=1 having healed an "Incurable" autoimmune condition using a carnivore (ketogenic) diet. The rationale to put it shortly is that cancer (amongs
922.
by lambdaba 7y ago
I've heard about great successes with animal based ketogenic diets, and fasting. There's a clinic in Hungary that treats and (tries to, despite apparent censorship), publish research: https://www.researchgate.net/p
923.
by lambdaba 7y ago
Absolutely, there's an excellent documentary about this called Going Home https://www.netflix.com/title/80209895
924.
by lambdaba 7y ago
There's absolutely no scientific basis for that, besides that I don't think he used LSD much if at all past the hippie period. Certainly not regularly (and there are people who have used LSD weekly for years with no apparent damag
925.
by lambdaba 7y ago
High (10g+) doses of omega-3 (mostly as EPA) are extremely effective and clinically proven. Standard doses are way too small to be effective, and most of the science and anecdotes refer to small (1-3g) doses.