lagudragu

11 ms·

31.
by lagudragu 11y ago
He could do something good with the 99% stock without using dodgy economics and PR stunts. That being said, let us see where this will turn out to.
32.
by lagudragu 11y ago
To start off: Using McDonalds' facts sheet as data regarding the content of their products is not really a valiable source of information, as this is heavily biased towards their product (ref. http://news.yale.edu/2010&
33.
by lagudragu 11y ago
Not to be cynical, but isn't this also just a method to ensure your company will remain for a longer duration? As a decline in facebook stock will indirectly hurt the philanthropic projects which are linked to it through his foundation
34.
by lagudragu 11y ago
I think you are having a bit of a misconception on the quality of McDonalds food. McDonalds and other major fastfood brands take shortcuts regarding the food production. It may seem to be "fresh" food to you, but you are eating fo
35.
by lagudragu 11y ago
I'm not entirely sure with the outcome of this possible evolution in crowdfunding, should it be succesfull. The crowdfunding business would get more saturated with 1000's of copycat / flavor of the month crowdfund setups or a
36.
by lagudragu 11y ago
His / her point is that de facto the industry takes a point of view biased on an economical perspective towards the situation. (Your answer ironically does reflect this as well). The benefit of having children is to have a family and t
37.
by lagudragu 11y ago
It is not the fact that nobody needs them. It is rather that members of such societies delay this step (to an uncertain extent) due to having a large amount of possible/alternative life choices, which sadly a negative consequence of su
38.
by lagudragu 11y ago
These are mostly economical solutions. The problem however seems to be on a sociographic level.