Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
la_barba
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
121.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
The foundation issues grants, and all of this is public information. Can you point to which grants you have a problem with and why? https://www.gatesfoundation.org/how-we-work/quick-links/gran... Some of my friend
122.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
That's a bit like not writing any new code unless you fix every single bug in the existing code. The counter-argument being that newer code will improve the design or fix some architectural issues, or handle upcoming feature requests b
123.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Well, there are many topics that we do science with, and which have multiple variables that we can't always control for, especially if you're doing survey studies for health, or disease or other macro-level stuff. It seems like th
124.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
I think the point is that Google wants fuzzy boundaries between things that were never fuzzy to begin with, until they started confusing people - whether they intended to or not. If you asked any person- How do go to your favorite website
125.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
That's the nerd pacifier. They will remove those flags eventually as they have always done.
126.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
I disagree. Given their history and given their capability, I give them an excellent chance to hang on to their current dominant position. They're still producing drool worthy glass.. the RF 28-70 F/2.. the RF 50mm 1.2 is the tits
127.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Well,.. the government is taking drug addiction seriously, so on principle I don't see why tech addiction should be a-priori excluded from discussion. I'm sure good people on both sides can disagree as to the measures that need to
128.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Looks like you have a good plan there :)
129.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Yeah, I think you are forced to re-train how you pickup and use the phone. An older non-smartphone could be easily picked up by grabbing the entire girth of the phone. With smartphones, people learned to pick it up using the side edges with
130.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
How are they put to shame by everyone else on AF? Could you be more specific?
131.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Because they want you to buy their expensive, professional EOS Cinema products for video use which have all the features you need.
132.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
What is your budget?
133.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Well, the EOS R and RP are entry level cameras. They have yet to release a professional series mirrorless camera. Comparatively, the 1st gen Sony mirrorless systems were pretty bad. They had tiny bodies that overheated, had poor battery lif
134.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Financial reports don't demonstrate anything. You're providing an explanation without actually demonstrating that the provided explanation is the real reason. A shrinking DSLR market has been predicted by analysts (and manufacture
135.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
You forgot one qualifier, the most expensive -professional- cameras. Different professionals have different needs. Every camera is designed with a usecase in mind. Off the top of my head professionals photographers need: * rugged tank-like
136.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Can you specify what you mean by high ISO performance? Do you mean read-noise or do you mean DR or something else? Canon is very competitive in read-noise and DR. Yes AFAIK they don't have dual-gain in their professional series, but th
137.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
While it may appear so from a retail consumer standpoint, I don't think Canon is lagging behind in tech from an IP and R&D standpoint. The thing is they make the sensor themselves, and the fabs and tooling is super super expensive.
138.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Sure, but there are several arguments for doing code reviews/QA/etc that are already convincing. Its interesting.. but I guess I don't see how we can use this new way of looking at code transformations to our benefit.
139.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
You can avoid this by not recommending products that are fulfilled by amazon.
140.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
You don't seem to be familiar with this. They had a hearing in the Senate, which featured testimony of experts in this field. https://gizmodo.com/this-is-how-youre-being-manipulated-1835...
141.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Its coming out of a social initiative that deals with the inability of parents to keep social media (and tech in general) addiction of their kids under control. Human beings have a lot of psychological vulnerabilities and, if you watched th
142.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Its possible to me the auto-play setting something that is enabled voluntarily by the user. This would solve your problem.
143.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Okay fair enough.. :)
144.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Google could have designed the system where each claim must be specific to a video url, time, and duration. (I think they have made changes recently to do that, but I'm not sure if they're active) That way the copyright owners are
145.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Hmm, but how do you establish whether a piece of code is a liability? Do you account for QA finding no issues, or do you weigh it against the number of years its been used in production, or do you consider that it was written by expert rath
146.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
I fully agree. I'm just pushing back against the sentiment of shitting on the little guy, because of a personal opinion that what this person is doing is vapid or devoid of value to me.
147.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Google has designed a system where a power dynamic where the copyright owner largely gets the ultimate say because of a combination of artificial "intelligence" algorithms, the ability to perform bulk claims, and googles indiffere
148.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
Which version of the C++ standard is this book targeting? Also, any links to reviews?
149.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
I suppose you could do the same with Amazon referral links to products that your team has personally reviewed?
150.
▲
by
la_barba
7y ago
I don't want to do math with flawed data. Every minute of uploaded content is not going to face copyright strikes, and does not need to be reviewed.
More ›