Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
l33tman
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
42 ms
·
481.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
Many tests are simply not that good. It's not that simple, like pay $1 for a test that with absolute certainty tells you if you have disease X or not. It would be good if that was the case because then it WOULD have been just a questio
482.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
But that wasn't with any black hole and it's not Hawking radiation. Basically they could as well have simulated that experiment on a computer and said the same thing (that what they got is similar in nature to Hawking radiation).
483.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
Please tell us the name of that European enterprise that breaches the GDPR and we can put the EU enforcement procedures to a test :) Let's call it an experiment..
484.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
The weak and strong interactions have other properties that screen their influence at longer ranges (just like with the EM force due to objects being mostly neutral in case of the strong interaction for example), but the strong force is ind
485.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
This book is mandatory reading.
486.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
In the keyfob there is usually a foldout key hidden even in modern cars
487.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
I guessed that he probably suspected he's unconscious or something, and therefore warranted shouting. After all, the leader had probably seen Top Gun, where this almost happened to Cougar :)
488.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
See this (by now archaic from 2018) video about adversarial attacks, he explains cross-architecture attacks here https://youtu.be/4rFOkpI0Lcg?t=462
489.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
Peter F. Hamilton writes a bit more action-oriented sci-fi (and not the Banks humour maybe) but I like his books, both the Pandora's Star duology and the Void trilogy to name two.
490.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
And.. what if, when you run it forward ahead of the present time, you come to a point where the simulation just crashes and you can't simulate ahead of that point no matter what you do? This is the premise of the tv series Devs. Cool i
491.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
It's because the story is about super-determinism; the simulated universes below are simulated identically to the one they are in, and statistically they are just one in the middle in that "pillar". So if they decide to destr
492.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
It's optional in gmail. I've had it disabled for years.
493.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
It's a bit complicated to compare the fees of a company like IKEA to the fees of small local companies, in that business sector I'm willing to guess there's a large fraction of non-tax-paying companies with worker unions non-
494.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
Note that as far as I could tell, this is a tool to check which unexpected AWS modifications can be done from API keys that you do make public in the first place. It doesn't "hack" an account per se. So for example if you
495.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
But it isn't that simple. There isn't a "proportional split" that can depend on the Schrödinger Equation. This is exactly why QM behaves non-intuitively in the first place - you can't add up probabilities from indiv
496.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
I wrote a minecraft clone with full physics sim, and networked multiplayer synced state between all clients. I had to spend a LOT of time on the multiplayer physics state propagation, it requires perfect clock synchronization, both client a
497.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
There are lots, as what you really are measuring are subtle variations in the sympathetic and parasympathetic drives of the heart by the autonomous nerve system. This can get affected by lots of things, a quick googling provided dozens of c
498.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
No, the kernel is a mixing of gradients from the training. The proof depends completely on the particular form of optimization, in this case gradient descent in the limit of infinitesimal "timestepping", and suggests that gradient
499.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
Yes same here, no problems whatsoever. One instance of a guy dropping through a floor so I had to reload and lose 5 minutes. Awesome game :) The console owners weren't as thrilled though.
500.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
Yes, S5 is basically only good because of the by now known actors and overall production quality. It's a much less interesting story than any of the previous seasons and keeps rehashing narratives and tropes. S1 was completely mindblow
501.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
Most theories' predictions are not open ended. It's possible to exhaustively search the prediction space to falsify them (up to an experimental standard that you need to agree on). I'm by far not an expert on super-symmetry b
502.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
Does it provide predictions that can be falsifiable? That's what we search for. In this context (anthropomorphic principle and multiverses to explain physical constants) I do think there are some statistical predictions possible that c
503.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
Just skimmed, but isn't collision detection in sprite hw usually incorporated in the overlay logic instead of just checking coordinates? If you have round sprites you don't want them to collide as rectangular shapes. The logic of
504.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
The placements of the engines affected tendencies at some pretty extreme parts of the flight envelope as far as I understood, and MCAS helped make these tendencies similar to the previous 737. I guess an analogy could be that depending on t
505.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
There is really nothing quantum in this, you can simulate this completely classically, although it takes forever as it's a slow process, as you seen when you compare the timescale of the video in the seconds to the timescale the atoms
506.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
I retired my Q6600 a few weeks ago, because CyberPunk 2077 couldn't run on it (lacking AVX instructions). Worked fine up until then in my gaming rig :) I still have my Core2 Duo in my HTPC... it's starting to feel doggy though.
507.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
Just to add a nitpick here, apart from them sharing some wave-like descriptions at some levels in the theory, there is not that much in common between photons and electrons. Fundamentally they play different parts in the theory (one being a
508.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
Thinking of them as waves helps your intuition for entry-level QM phenomena like the dual-slit experiment and other lab-scale interferometry experiments. Unfortunately, I would say it doesn't help (and could actually block you) when yo
509.
▲
by
l33tman
6y ago
Maybe we'll get some context to the pentagon-released videos of earlier this year now. Or we won't... From the article: The director of National Intelligence and the secretary of defense have a little less than six months now to p
510.
▲
Covid19 bill forces intelligence agencies to release UFO data in 180 days
(us.cnn.com)
3 points
by
l33tman
6y ago
|
1 comments
More ›