l33t233372

9 ms·

91.
by l33t233372 3y ago
People shooting themselves in the head often reflexively pull the trigger twice. Do you suppose the elite hit squad that came to kill him simply added an extra bullet by mistake?
92.
by l33t233372 3y ago
Funding an anti-communist death squad that also sells drugs isn’t exactly the same as bringing crack to the hood.
93.
by l33t233372 3y ago
To wit, the study was run my Harvard psychologists, not CIA.
94.
by l33t233372 3y ago
Step one, then, is to have something interesting to say. Unfortunately it isn’t generally the case that people have something interesting to write at length about, and even more rarely do they have something interesting to say about the spe
95.
by l33t233372 3y ago
The term deep state was first used popularly far after these things were made public.
96.
by l33t233372 3y ago
I think we’re saying the same thing. Are we not?
97.
by l33t233372 3y ago
> The fact that the US needs to use military force is a failure of policy. And a million realists(in the technical sense that IR people use the word) cried out in terror at once.
98.
by l33t233372 3y ago
Peaceful just has to be a continuum in order for us to make any sense of a theory of peace. Certainly wars between great powers and much smaller countries are more peaceful than near-peer wars.
99.
by l33t233372 3y ago
The PSI system was pretty cool in my opinion. It was a very neat algorithm for obtaining information about set intersection in a privacy preserving way.
100.
by l33t233372 3y ago
I’m not sure what you mean about HN identifying this. Aren’t HN’s points public?
101.
by l33t233372 3y ago
I know a very early version of chatGPT could be busted by asking it to write its input backwards and talk about it
102.
by l33t233372 3y ago
HN reinvents the “text book.”
103.
by l33t233372 3y ago
One problem is that often science says nothing about policy. _Science_ doesn’t say we should ban fossil fuels, but it does make predictions about what will happen if we continue to use them at the current rate. It’s not science denial to be
104.
by l33t233372 3y ago
> It would permanently have assigned its own segment of the global system address space We’ve been moving away from this for security reasons with ASLR and position independent executables. Fixed targets are dangerous for security reason
105.
by l33t233372 3y ago
Yes let me just rip the keyboard I carry with me out of my back pocket.
106.
by l33t233372 3y ago
It’s like the Ohio of Europe
107.
by l33t233372 3y ago
I highly doubt many Oculus devices were sold that were used 0 times.
108.
by l33t233372 3y ago
They say their model works for a hypothetical privacy preserving camera that masks 90% of the pixels. I’m not sure there’s much more to it; I think you’re reading too far into it. It shows the power of their model and possible applications
109.
by l33t233372 3y ago
Not to disagree with infallible thousands of years old advice, but surely resources are in far shorter supply than potential attacks, so we have to prioritize and filter.
110.
by l33t233372 3y ago
I bet you could have gotten far with a reply to the effect of “a job.”
111.
by l33t233372 3y ago
As someone with graduate level math experience and many friends in mathematics grad school, I know what you mean, but it definitely depends on your idea of fun. You have to enjoy bashing your head against a problem for a dozen hours. Or to
112.
by l33t233372 3y ago
Is it it even technically for the model to know it’s hallucinating?
113.
by l33t233372 3y ago
I was referring to the instantiation of a TM as having a one sided tape.
114.
by l33t233372 3y ago
I think my autocorrect got the better of me there!
115.
by l33t233372 3y ago
It’s unclear to me why restricting ourselves to that model is useful here
116.
by l33t233372 3y ago
I’ve never seen “asymptomatic density” referred to as “asymptomatic probability.” Anyways, if anyone is interested is a more complete survey of similarly flavored computability/density results, this paper is good: https://fa
117.
by l33t233372 3y ago
There is no such notion of “undefined memory region” for a Turing Machine
118.
by l33t233372 3y ago
It’s not to test if X works, it’s to test if X has any chance of working.
119.
by l33t233372 3y ago
Wars of defense are entirely different in my opinion.
120.
by l33t233372 3y ago
I’m not sure I agree. Can you be more precise about what you mean by repeating? If you mean “contains an infinite arithmetic progression” then surely this is not true. Could you also be more precise about what you mean by true randomness?

More ›