Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
l332mn
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
31.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
> Countries should decide for themselves if they'd like to be crowded Uh.. How exactly are countries supposed to decide if they'd "like" to be crowded? By the way, do you think the matter of simply possessing a large,
32.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
Not sure what your argument is. We're talking about per capita emissions, not per country emissions, which doesn't even make sense. Why would an arbitrary grouping of human beings like a nation matter in terms of what emissions ea
33.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
> Are you saying the data is simply wrong? The data only measures cement production and fossil fuel burning, as the caption says. It says nothing about total emissions per capita. Hence the title is wrong, yes. > The article is about
34.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
They're not, though. Household emissions are many, many times larger now. Also wood is not a fossil fuel.
35.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
These graphs measures "burning of fossil fuels for energy and cement production" only, which only represents a fraction of the total emissions in a country. It doesn't measure household emissions or food production. It also h
36.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
To put it bluntly, what the title says is just not true. This graph measures the "burning of fossil fuels for energy and cement production". Cement production and burning of fossil fules only. Hence it is misleading at best. It do
37.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
The wild amounts of dollar printing can't continue once the dollar loses its status as world reserve currency, which is happening as we speak as other major nations are gradually moving away from the dollar as a medium for mutual excha
38.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
The NASA scientists went on and revolutionised the tech and manufacturing industry after the lunar landing. I'd hardly say this is a case of technological supremacy reverting, rather the opposite. The technical expertise developed ther
39.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
True, congressional report, not government document. Although, government officials seem to agree with these conclusions https://edition.cnn.com/2021/07/16/politics/biden-intel-revi...
40.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
The US is really doubling down on the narrative that the WHO has been covering up the epidemic. The pettiness and lack of honesty among US politicians is staggering. "In the original report, we laid out many of the ways the Chinese Com
41.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
In fact, the Soviet union was there at the time of the US moon landing, as their automated Luna 15 craft crashed into the lunar surface.
42.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
Have you ever reflected on the magnitude of American patriotism post-WW2, especially during wartime? Seems to be a major case of widespread, ideological and irrational pro-governmental belief.
43.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
Incidentally, there was a lot of simulations of what was going on on television during the time, especially leading up to the landing itself. It may have had something to do with why it got stuck in peoples mind that the entire thing was si
44.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
We don't have exact data for the entire product life cycle emissions, but the data I provided give some indications of the difference in scale. What we can see is that 1) Household emissions represent the largest share of global emissi
45.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
There is a broader international movement towards using better tracking of product life cycle emissions: https://www.unep.org/explore-topics/resource-efficiency/what... Such data, when generally available, will gi
46.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
Those statistics are very incomplete, as they don't measure the emissions connected to the whole lifecycle of products, but rather seem to track only a weighted average of production based emissions (which appears to be their definitio
47.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
The talk about China is predictively ignorant and in conflict with facts. Since you're still mentioning total emissions instead of per capita emissions, I can only assume you have a political axe to grind.
48.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
These statistics don't take into account consumption based emissions, only production based emissions (except oil production, I believe). Western countries have outsourced their production to developing countries (which looks nice for
49.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
> But western countries emissions have been gradually declining while China's has been increasing rapidly. This is a half-truth. Production based emissions have gone down in western countries and up in China. However, this doesn
50.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
Not really. The lab leak theory was always dismissed by the WHO team of researches. However, I brought up the fact that the virus unlikely originated in Wuhan according to the WHO researches as an additional piece of evidence of how unlikel
51.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
The symptoms are quite similar actually. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2... "The paper emphasises that EVALI remains a diagnosis of exclusion, highlighting the importance of
52.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
And what conflict of interest is that?
53.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
It's generally understood that due to the major overlap in symptoms, the lung illness from the vaping disease could easily have been misdiagnosed cases of Covid. This due to the fact that Covid was unknown. Misdiagnoses are extremely c
54.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
The first confirmed Covid cases were in Wuhan, but that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about the place of origination. The lead researcher of the WHO team says himself it's unlikely to have originated in Wuhan
55.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
> Credible genetic analysis of the virus shows nearly incontrovertibly that it originated in Wuhan. What are you talking about? That's just not true. There is zero incontrovertible evidence that it originated in Wuhan. " https:
56.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
Reddit is definitely not the whole world. It's heavily dominated by people from the US and western europe, and heavily biased towards the the mainstream western propaganda narrative. Reddit is an active target for propagandists (i.e. i
57.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
No they haven't, it's simply one possible explanation. It's still be "best" (i.e. most convenient) theory. Besides, these "attacks" even happened in Washington DC. Was that Russia also? Who did it, how did
58.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
>Even just with the evidence made public, it's the most plausible explanation. It's not the most plausible explanation, but it is the most convenient one. It shifts the blame and reinforces the narrative. They don't even h
59.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
I don't think you're following.
60.
▲
by
l332mn
5y ago
We're talking about evidence for an attack.
More ›