l23k4

9 ms·

121.
by l23k4 4mo ago
Those poor pension funds, unable to make their own decisions. Forced to keep all of their money in $NDX forever. It must be terrible to be so utterly powerless.
122.
by l23k4 4mo ago
What are you even trying to say? Where does the taxman enter into this?
123.
by l23k4 4mo ago
What thievery happens in the stock market?
124.
by l23k4 4mo ago
It's the way they acted after they became aware of the problem that makes them look cartoonishly evil.
125.
by l23k4 4mo ago
How do you suppose those would prove your point?
126.
by l23k4 4mo ago
Do you live in a cave? I guess not. Do you have access to the internet? Seemingly yes. The booms just tend to be much bigger than the busts.
127.
by l23k4 4mo ago
I'm not saying the Tate specifically encouraged people to take pictures of those flats. I'm saying the Tate encouraged people to take pictures of those flats. They put up a viewing platform where the flats were one of the main e
128.
by l23k4 4mo ago
The cost-benefit ratio of using VMs over containers is very high. You trade negligible overhead for an actual security boundary. Containers don't provide good isolation and tend to be trivial to break out of.
129.
by l23k4 4mo ago
> That entirely depends on one's threat-model I think not, virtualization has such low overhead now that there's just no excuse. It's generally trivial to switch from containers to VMs.
130.
by l23k4 4mo ago
Using containers as a security boundary is inexcusable.
131.
by l23k4 4mo ago
Why did Tate not reach out to the apartment owners and pay for privacy film installation before they opened the viewing platform?
132.
by l23k4 4mo ago
The museum only decided to start encouraging the egregious behavior after the flats were built. The museum knew the egregious behavior by their guests was taking place and did not intervene until forced to do so by the courts. I really don&
133.
by l23k4 4mo ago
I have to agree with rjjejriridd on this one, despite their inappropriate tone. Everyone knows "open to public" does not mean that you can operate a lemonade stand or conduct a professional photoshoot.
134.
by l23k4 5mo ago
Of course it's on the museum, this was an entirely predictable outcome.
135.
by l23k4 5mo ago
> the prohibition of "professional" photography equipment You want endless influencer photoshoots with professional lighting setups and whatnot?
136.
by l23k4 5mo ago
>I'm looking at the pictures in this article and that doesn't seem egregious: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-64481260 That's just a function of the lenses being used. The distance is 34 me
137.
by l23k4 5mo ago
> Isn't it on the individuals occupying the apartment to use curtains of some sort if they don't want to be seen? Sure, but the problem here was explicitly not the individuals occupying the apartments being seen. >Unless I
138.
by l23k4 5mo ago
I don't mind people seeing into my flat. I would very much mind the specific, egregious behaviour described in the court case.
139.
by l23k4 5mo ago
> If you don’t want public to see in your house don’t live next to a museum? That's simply not what the court case was about. I pasted a bit from the ruling in a sibling comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=
140.
by l23k4 5mo ago
I didn't know they had instagram and smartphones back then, those were key elements here.
141.
by l23k4 5mo ago
This was a decision made by five supreme court justices in a 3/2 split, do you have any particular reason to believe there has been corruption involved in this UK litigation?
142.
by l23k4 5mo ago
There's also essentially zero overlap between the people who complain about knife crime, and the people who encounter knife crime in London.
143.
by l23k4 5mo ago
If I secretly hide a camera in your bedroom, would the violation of privacy be made more egregious if I then went ahead and broadcast that footage on TV? >Isn’t it just you have a window to look in or not? And every building has windows
144.
by l23k4 5mo ago
Yes? That wasn't the complaint. Do you have 20+ people looking into your home all day long, taking photos and posting them on instagram? Visitors in the viewing gallery frequently look into the claimants' flats and take phot
145.
by l23k4 5mo ago
Come on, this was just gross by Tate and the supreme court was right to put a stop to it. I visited the extension before it opened, it was obvious this was going to be a problem. A busy viewing terrace is not an ordinary use of space, bui
146.
by l23k4 5mo ago
>I think that is no longer true and maybe this decision by Denmark is a data point of how the Nordics are changing? No, this is just standard pension fund governance.
147.
by l23k4 5mo ago
This is maybe sort of true, but few garments that say "dry clean only" actually need to be dry cleaned. This has typically more to do with laziness on the part of the manufacturers. Things like lining, interfacing and structure ar
148.
by l23k4 5mo ago
> I have a coat that is the best of both worlds, loden with a Gore-Tex membrane. Until the goretex delaminates and becomes impossible to repair, of course.
149.
by l23k4 5mo ago
SandboxEscaper and Nightmare Eclipse both explicitly deny this, but I'm pretty sure they're the same person. The style is the same, and it appears that SandboxEscaper has previously been fired by MSFT. (they are not dead) https:&
150.
by l23k4 5mo ago
LLM written. See the authors twitter, he speaks english at a rather basic level and certainly did not write this https://x.com/mohitgeryani/with_replies

More ›