l23k4

5 ms·

61.
by l23k4 4mo ago
Wow, you guys really think this is good? Because of the same rules, German restaurants also get to pick and choose which reviews stay up. They can literally take down any specific reviews they like. A restaurant that mostly gets 1 star revi
62.
by l23k4 4mo ago
That seems like an unreasonable interpretation of what I said, which was just pointing out the futility of the Swiss position. EU can impose its will at essentially zero cost no matter what the Swiss do.
63.
by l23k4 4mo ago
The Israeli public largely supports this, given that Israel is a western democracy, it's not surprising that the state behaves in a way that matches the hearts and minds of its people.
64.
by l23k4 4mo ago
I think the odds of a happy person being willing to put in the work to reach the positions those two notoriously unhappy individuals have reached are rather low. I strongly suspect that the more leisurely rich are overrepresented among Aqua
65.
by l23k4 4mo ago
The author is a LLM.
66.
by l23k4 4mo ago
Half of the Romanians moved to other EU countries and then sent significant chunk of their earnings back home :)
67.
by l23k4 4mo ago
This is a deeply dishonest characterization of the FCAS.
68.
by l23k4 4mo ago
The EU will retaliate this time around and impose ruinous costs on Switzerland if it chooses to go through with this. Unlike the Brits, the Swiss have absolutely no leg to stand on here. If EU closes the borders, the Swiss will literally di
69.
by l23k4 4mo ago
They're economically sterilizing themselves by starting a conflict with the EU at that point.
70.
by l23k4 4mo ago
>"Mass immigration is your punishment for the British Empire" has a certain ideological appeal. But if you're a British person, you don't care about that. What matters is whether you'd rather live in London as it
71.
by l23k4 4mo ago
I'd guess there's a very high chance someone wearing an Aquanaut is having a better time than someone wearing a $700 Tissot or a $17 Casio, less of a difference between the latter two. It's not telling better time, it's
72.
by l23k4 4mo ago
> And I'm saying wallstreet has a reputation of breaking the rules. Among whom does wall street hold this reputation? Breaking which rules? How can that be, in an incredibly regulated industry where the government will try to put yo
73.
by l23k4 4mo ago
Given that India lacks a functioning judiciary, we might be waiting a while. Plenty of cases over 30 years old waiting for supreme court rulings.
74.
by l23k4 4mo ago
No, all you can read into that is where they believe the fair value to be. If it landed in the middle, you'd obviously have to pick up a much larger delta in options given the liquidity issues on Indian markets. >They were moving th
75.
by l23k4 4mo ago
I have! JS was engaged in standard arbitrage and did nothing wrong. SEBI is coming after them because JS being able to do what it was doing is deeply embarrassing.
76.
by l23k4 4mo ago
>Furthermore, there is nothing wrong with calling out shit companies ran by shit people, that present a real danger to the world. But you didn't call anybody out.
77.
by l23k4 4mo ago
Why is nobody able to link this reporting? Google doesn't find it either.
78.
by l23k4 4mo ago
> of course, they've engineered a new way of making even more money You claim this to have been engineered somehow
79.
by l23k4 4mo ago
> Where do you see a conspiracy theory? You are presenting a theory that an unidentified group of people is engaged in a conspiracy to change the rules of the major indices for corrupt reasons. That's a conspiracy theory. It might b
80.
by l23k4 4mo ago
>Point 1. Corruption has penetrated the highest echelons of USAnian politics. The president is unabashed in his corruption and has corrupted (is corrupting) the financial regulators (I follow Molly White who has been particularly good on
81.
by l23k4 4mo ago
Yep, almost all of my comments questioning this conspiracy theory have been flagged, with many being set [dead] by them moderators.
82.
by l23k4 4mo ago
And here's some rather more clueful analysis instead of what looks like AI-generated marketing blogspam: https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/newsletters/2025-07-07/jan... ( https://archive.fo&#x2
83.
by l23k4 4mo ago
Incompetent SEBI went after Jane Street for closing an arb, what about it?
84.
by l23k4 4mo ago
Why did you feel the need to post this disinformation? Do you get paid to spread these lies?
85.
by l23k4 4mo ago
>Following the rules of passive indexes is the whole point. The whole point of these indices is to represent the market, the rules are unsustainable if they cause too big of a divergence from that goal. > The blatantly corrupt move to
86.
by l23k4 4mo ago
> But in the face of such apparent malfeasance perhaps no longer Do you have any sources to share in support of this claim of malfeasance?
87.
by l23k4 4mo ago
> I want the indices to follow the same passive strategy they always have Okay? But the debate has been specifically about getting rid of new rules introduced in recent decades as they're incompatible with the purpose of the indices
88.
by l23k4 4mo ago
>of course, they've engineered a new way of making even more money. The pile of passive money in ver low expenses index funds obviously have been a fat target for them. Are you planning to substantiate this conspiracy theory in any
89.
by l23k4 4mo ago
It's not my fault their conspiracy theory is awfully similar to popular long-running far-right conspiracy theories.
90.
by l23k4 4mo ago
Where did I say I was refuting their claim? Why would you expect that?

More ›