kzhahou

30 ms·

271.
by kzhahou 11y ago
What didn't you like about Austin?
272.
by kzhahou 11y ago
TLDR: Make decisions quickly.
273.
by kzhahou 11y ago
I've seen Algebra:Ch0 around but haven't picked it up yet. Thanks for the recommendation!
274.
by kzhahou 11y ago
Personally I find category theory to be a red herring when it comes to Haskell and really programming. I feel that people learn a bit of CT, then quote it endlessly as a sort of elevation of programming from lowly code-slinging to a high m
275.
by kzhahou 11y ago
Please list the features that were patently anti-user and done for Amazon's sole benefit.
276.
by kzhahou 11y ago
BTW, a little late here... but my comment was actually intended as pure sarcasm over the fact that anyone would so angrily scoff at the idea of paying $20 to a fellow developer and Haskell enthusiast, who is just trying to help others enjoy
277.
by kzhahou 11y ago
Implying that Facebook built this in response to a service that had a weekend+ of buzz?
278.
by kzhahou 11y ago
Support channel is where I go when I can't access my account, or want to submit a feature request. Anyway, it'd be awesome if someone posted a technical response here, but I don't expect them to.
279.
by kzhahou 11y ago
Github employees are here on HN, and just as likely to answer here vs a tweet or whatever.
280.
by kzhahou 11y ago
It seems a certainty to me that github will be breached one of these days, and all internal data (i.e., private repos) made public. On that day, so many companies will inadvertently become open source! Do we have any info on what steps git
281.
by kzhahou 11y ago
Like you, I am also sick and tired of people trying to come up with easy-to-use tools for learning Haskell. I love the language, and feel that if someone wants to learn it in a "sandbox", then there's no point. I can't
282.
by kzhahou 11y ago
That is true, but you can't infer they didn't enjoy their jobs.
283.
by kzhahou 11y ago
Indeed. Only a matter of time before reddit and hackernews get dumped. That's be fun (esp. reddit)
284.
by kzhahou 11y ago
Sniff test, nothing. This is absolutely ludicrous. 20 hour work-days (9am->5am) for months straight??? Gimme a break. You'd be hallucinating on the second week. For the life of me I don't understand how this humble-brag is
285.
by kzhahou 11y ago
Absolutely beautiful work. Love it. At the same time, though, as a commentary by the acclaimed Banksy, isn't "Disneyland is over-commercialized hell" a cliched theme at this point?
286.
by kzhahou 11y ago
Maybe 255 characters is too long also. Let's just have a 10 character max: "Got big" or "Succeeded" In fact, we could represent it as a bit-field, and then get the story in one byte: 0x01: Made a key product/m
287.
by kzhahou 11y ago
From the headline to the article itself, I prefer to think of it as " Entrepreneurs Get Hardcode About Hardware." YC vets and funds -- the innovation belongs to the teams.
288.
by kzhahou 11y ago
Truth is, this service never quite delivered on their promise. When my last two startups closed shop, it took shutdownify over 3 days to process the first one, and the second was still a full two days to get up and running. At that point
289.
by kzhahou 11y ago
Whereupon we find out that a developer had indeed added CC to the database, and the CTO didn't know...? :-\
290.
by kzhahou 11y ago
Wonderful production value and nice presentation. Looking forward to more of these.
291.
by kzhahou 11y ago
Ha. There's something about asking founders how much money they've made that makes people particularly uncomfortable.
292.
by kzhahou 11y ago
This guy integrates!
293.
by kzhahou 11y ago
Is it even up for debate, that bash is hard to get right?
294.
by kzhahou 11y ago
Congratulations on the amazing adoption rate! I've seen this live on hundreds on sites the last few years.
295.
by kzhahou 11y ago
Sorry the original idea didn't pan out. Good luck on the new endeavor!!
296.
by kzhahou 11y ago
The fund, the firm, and the individuals who led investments. No?
297.
by kzhahou 11y ago
Kinda pathetic though, isn't it? A group of people devote their lives to a product, working round-the-clock for years, and then reap ( relatively ) tiny rewards compared to the money man.
298.
by kzhahou 11y ago
>There’s a point in every business where you can double down on the risk, you can exit, or you can raise money. Doubling down on risk: does that mean grow the product and company scope using existing funds only?
299.
by kzhahou 11y ago
I honestly don't understand why any of this is necessary. Without the doc, if I hurl nasty insults and personal attacks, the community will tell me to fuck off and not accept my work. Won't they?
300.
by kzhahou 11y ago
rubs thomasfoster06's shoulders aggressively Tell me to stop. I WON'T.

More ›