kweingar

39 ms·

1. 451.▲
   by kweingar 5y ago

   I'm uncomfortable with this argument. It seems that people here are pretty comfortable advocating for regime change in Russia and punishing the population until it happens. I don't think the implications of this have been though
2. 452.▲
   by kweingar 5y ago

   My guess is that it's a portmanteau of Frankenstein and Zuckerberg. At least I hope it is. Either way, it's unfortunate wording
3. 453.▲
   by kweingar 5y ago

   In most of these colonization/industrialization games, the entire point is the thrill of taming a wild land and producing grand feats of engineering out of nothing. The survivalist framing, with mindlessly hostile natives, is just a n
4. 454.▲
   by kweingar 5y ago

   I always wonder how laws about human interaction will translate to virtual space. In physical space, there are so many ways that people bother/assault each other, which can land you in serious trouble. Will virtual space be treated s
5. 455.▲
   by kweingar 5y ago

   The main concern I have is the technological/administrative burden put on smaller platforms, which would cause further consolidation of the web. What obligations this would impose on an operator of a small web forum?
6. 456.▲
   by kweingar 5y ago

   > Chun explains: “There are 3,003 scenarios where 10 people can be chosen from the 15 applicants, and only 11 scenarios where all 10 are men. All things being equal, the chance that the top 10 applicants would all be male is 11 out of 3,